Skip to main content
Glama
Grinv

AniList MCP Server

Post a message activity

post_message_activity

Post a public message-style activity to an AniList user's profile or update an existing one by ID. Note: messages are publicly visible, not private.

Instructions

[Requires login] Post a new message-style activity to another AniList user's profile, or update an existing one by passing its id. Despite the name, this is NOT a private DM — like post_text_activity, it's publicly visible on both users' activity feeds/profiles to anyone who can view them. This is a limitation of this tool, not AniList itself: AniList's underlying mutation does accept a private argument, but this tool doesn't expose it, so every message sent through it is public. Don't use it for anything the sender expects to stay confidential.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoActivity ID to update instead of creating a new post.
messageYesThe message text to post (per AniList's own schema: 2-10000 characters).
recipientIdYesAniList numeric user ID of the message recipient (resolve a username via search_user first).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
activityYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.9.0
    • removedOutput schema / properties / activity / properties / message / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / activity / properties / message / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. Changed8 schema fields changedv0.7.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / exclusiveMinimum
      Added value: +0
    • removedInput schema / properties / id / minimum
      Removed value: --2147483648
    • addedInput schema / properties / recipientId / exclusiveMinimum
      Added value: +0
    • removedInput schema / properties / recipientId / minimum
      Removed value: --2147483648
    • addedOutput schema / properties / activity / properties / id / exclusiveMinimum
      Added value: +0
    • changedOutput schema / properties / activity / properties / id / maximum
      Previous value: -9007199254740991New value: +2147483647
    • removedOutput schema / properties / activity / properties / id / minimum
      Removed value: --9007199254740991
    • changedOutput schema / properties / activity / properties / siteUrl / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "format": "uri",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
  3. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.5.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / message / description
      Previous value: -"The message text to post."New value: +"The message text to post (per AniList's own schema: 2-10000 characters)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / message / maxLength
      Added value: +10000
    • changedInput schema / properties / message / minLength
      Previous value: -1New value: +2
  4. Addedv0.2.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes well beyond the annotations by revealing that the operation is publicly visible despite the 'message' framing, that the underlying AniList mutation supports a 'private' argument the tool does not expose, and that updates are possible. This directly addresses the most likely misconception about the tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded: the main purpose comes first, then the update mode, then the critical visibility warning. Every sentence earns its place and no unnecessary wording is present.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with a detailed input schema and an output schema, the description provides the essential operational context: login requirement, public visibility, update behavior, and a clear confidentiality warning. Nothing critical is missing for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and each parameter already has a clear schema description. The tool description adds context about 'id' meaning update mode, but largely restates what the schema already documents. It does not significantly enhance parameter-level understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Post a new message-style activity to another AniList user's profile') and a second mode ('or update an existing one by passing its id'). It also differentiates the tool from a private DM and references post_text_activity for comparison, making the tool's identity unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states the login requirement, distinguishes create-vs-update usage, and gives a clear when-not-to-use rule: do not use it for anything the sender expects to stay confidential. This is strong practical guidance for an agent deciding whether to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.