Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ModelLens

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Discovers LLM models in real time from cloud providers and local Ollama instances, returning compatibility profiles and live pricing so AI agents can route tasks to the cheapest viable model without breaking tool calls or context clipping.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Independent latency and uptime data for 46 hosted AI inference APIs, probed every 5 minutes from 4 regions with no gateway, plus a verified model deprecation calendar and Claude Code / Codex speed and accuracy drift. Four read-only tools, no API key; data CC BY 4.0.
      2
      4
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants and agent workflows to query live measured free-LLM performance and availability, including throughput, uptime, tool-calling success, and model diagnostics.
      4
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an LLM client to discover models, monitor pool capacity, run rate-limited chats without silent model switching, perform probes, inspect usage, and search or fetch web pages through a local gateway.
      34 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes queryable GPU inference benchmark data (quantization, throughput, VRAM, concurrent users) as tools for LLM clients.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct pipeline stage (list → probe → rank → recommend → report), so purposes are mostly clear. The only soft overlap is between 'ranking' (quality ordering from history) and 'recommend' (best model for a task profile), which could be confused by an agent wanting a single 'which is best' answer.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Only list_models follows a verb_noun pattern; the rest mix bare verbs (probe, recommend) with bare nouns (ranking, report). The names are readable and short, but the convention is not predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a model evaluation/benchmarking server, and each maps to a necessary stage of the workflow. No tool feels redundant or padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers listing, probing, ranking, recommending, and reporting, which is a full analysis lifecycle. However, endpoints are referenced as 'configured' yet there is no tool to add, edit, or remove endpoints, and no way to clear or inspect probe history beyond the derived ranking.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing