Skip to main content
Glama
GravityFinance

@gravv/mcp

Official
by GravityFinance
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to @gravv/mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • clawvault

      andrewszk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for ClawVault - an AI agent payment security layer that enables Claude to request payments, check limits, and manage transactions with configurable rules.
      59 npm
      MIT

    • AgentPay

      joepangallo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AgentPay — the payment gateway for autonomous AI agents. Fund a wallet once, give your agent the key, and it discovers, provisions, and pays for tool APIs on its own. One key, every tool.
      112 npm
      1
      MIT

    • adaptis-mcp-server

      fredericktvf
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that lets AI agents interact with the Adaptis (MEG) payment gateway, enabling payment link creation, transaction queries, refunds, and integration helpers like generating signed forms and verifying callbacks.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct, non-overlapping purpose: one searches documentation, the other fetches a specific page by slug. No ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent CamelCase pattern with a verb (search, get) followed by the subject (GravvDocs, GravvDocPage). Naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is on the lean side, but for a documentation-searching purpose the pair is reasonable and well-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the core documentation workflow—search and retrieve full text. A minor gap is the lack of a browse-all-pages feature, but the essential operations are present.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources