SeedPEA MCP Adapter
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| review_evaluator_grant_jsonA | Inspect declared PEA evaluator-grant fields without granting authority. |
| review_release_envelope_jsonB | Inspect declared SEED-aligned release fields without approving release. |
| inspect_authority_separation_jsonC | Inspect whether crossing roles are separately declared without authorizing action. |
| review_institutional_branch_registration_jsonA | Inspect an institutional branch declaration without registering it. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| status | Return the adapter's versioned status and non-claims. |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the PEA/SEED declaration inspection process: authority separation, evaluator grants, release envelopes, and institutional branch registration. The descriptions clearly differentiate the purpose of each tool, so an agent would not confuse them.
All tool names follow a consistent pattern of verb_object_json, using either 'inspect' or 'review' as the verb followed by the specific domain object. This is a uniform and predictable naming convention.
With 4 tools, the set is compact and focused on a specialized inspection domain. The count is appropriate for the narrow scope, though slightly minimal but not insufficient.
The tools cover four key inspection areas within the PEA/SEED domain, providing a coherent surface for non-authorizing inspections. There might be additional inspection scenarios not covered, but the set appears reasonably complete for its stated purpose.