mcp-bastion
mcp-bastion is a reliability and security proxy for MCP servers, providing self-healing connections, runtime security, and compliance auditing. It merges tools from multiple upstream servers into a single interface with automatic namespacing.
bastion__status— Check the health of all proxied servers: connection status (connected, disconnected, reconnecting, failed), tool counts, and last errors.bastion__reconnect— Reconnect a specified disconnected or failed server by name to restore its tools.bastion__security— View runtime security for each tool: pin status (approved vs. changed definitions, i.e., rug‑pull detection), poisoning heuristics, and cross‑server tool name shadowing.bastion__approve— Re-approve a tool whose definition has changed after manual review, clearing a rug‑pull block (operator-only).bastion__compliance— Get an audit summary of recent activity mapped to NIST AI RMF and OWASP LLM Top 10 (requires audit logging to be enabled).
It also automatically reconnects to standard I/O servers with configurable backoff, pins tool definitions, and records hash‑chained audit events to multiple sinks with optional argument redaction.
Proxies and manages connections to the GitHub MCP server, providing tools for repository management, issue tracking, and other GitHub API operations.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@mcp-bastionshow me the status of all connected servers"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
🛡️ mcp-bastion
A reliability & security proxy for the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
Self-healing connections, runtime tool-security, and a compliance-mapped audit trail for your MCP servers.
mcp-bastion sits between your MCP client (Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, Zed, Claude
Desktop, or any MCP-compliant agent) and your MCP servers. It is client-agnostic — it works with
any compliant client through configuration alone, with zero client-specific code — and non-invasive:
your servers run unchanged, and removing Bastion is a one-line config revert.
📦 Package: mcp-bastion on npm · 🗂️ Official MCP Registry: io.github.Gowthaman90/mcp-bastion
🔒 Security, measured: on the open, vendor-neutral mcp-defense-bench, Bastion covers 63% of the MCP attack surface (15.0/24 vectors; 11 enforced) at zero false positives — the broadest of the proxies measured.
📖 Launch story: Medium · dev.to
👤 Created & maintained by Gowthaman Arumugam — Independent Researcher. Companion benchmark: mcp-defense-bench.
Contents
Related MCP server: McpVanguard
Why
When an MCP server disconnects mid-session, the agent only sees a generic "No such tool available" error — indistinguishable from a tool that never existed — and it cannot reconnect; only a human can. Long agent sessions silently lose capabilities and fail in confusing ways.
Bastion closes that gap. It health-checks every server, auto-reconnects with backoff, and — crucially — exposes control tools so the agent itself can inspect connection health and recover a dropped server without human intervention.
Bastion now spans three layers: reliability (v0.1), runtime security (v0.2 — tool pinning / rug-pull & poisoning detection), and audit & compliance (v0.3 — pluggable sinks mapped to NIST AI RMF / OWASP LLM Top 10). See the roadmap.
How it works
Today your client connects directly to each server. With Bastion, your client connects to Bastion, which connects to those same servers on your behalf — so it sits in the tool-call path and can add reliability (and, later, security) transparently.
Before: Client ─▶ server A / server B / server C
After: Client ─▶ mcp-bastion ─▶ server A
─▶ server B
─▶ server CBastion is a standard MCP server to your client and a standard MCP client to each upstream. Because it speaks the protocol faithfully, it works with every compliant client automatically — the only per-client difference is where you put a few lines of config.
Features
🔌 Client-agnostic — one binary, config-only integration; no per-client plugins.
♻️ Self-healing — health checks + capped exponential-backoff auto-reconnect for stdio servers.
🧭 Agent-recoverable —
bastion__statusandbastion__reconnectlet the agent detect and fix drops itself, instead of hitting an opaque "no such tool" wall.🧩 Transparent aggregation — merges many servers into one, with per-server tool namespacing to prevent collisions and tool-shadowing.
💬 Legible failures — a dropped server yields an actionable message, not a crash.
🛡️ Runtime security (new in v0.2) — pins each tool's definition and blocks "rug pulls" (a server changing a tool after approval); heuristically inspects descriptions for poisoning; detects cross-server shadowing. See Runtime security.
📝 Audit & compliance (new in v0.3, opt-in) — structured, integrity-hash-chained audit events to pluggable sinks (console / file / webhook), mapped to NIST AI RMF & OWASP LLM Top 10. See Audit & compliance.
🪶 Non-invasive & reversible — your servers run unchanged; uninstall is a config revert.
🧱 Enterprise-grade codebase — strict TypeScript, layered architecture, ESLint + Prettier, and unit + end-to-end tests.
Quick start
Bastion is published on npm as mcp-bastion — the
npx command below fetches it automatically, so there's nothing to install first.
1. Add Bastion to your client, pointing it at a config file:
// your client's mcpServers config
{
"mcpServers": {
"bastion": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "mcp-bastion", "--config", "bastion.config.json"],
},
},
}2. List your real servers in bastion.config.json (moved verbatim from the client):
{
"servers": {
"github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"] },
"filesystem": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "/path/to/dir"],
},
},
"reconnect": { "auto": true },
"healthCheck": { "enabled": true },
}3. Restart your client. Your tools now appear namespaced (e.g. github__create_issue) alongside
Bastion's control tools. See bastion.config.example.json for the
full set of options.
🔒 Security is on by default. Out of the box, Bastion runs the
balancedenforcement profile: it blocks high-confidence attacks (rug-pulls, argument/command injection, cross-server exfiltration) and warns on heuristic ones (description/response poisoning), while redacting leaked secrets from tool results. Setsecurity.enforcementProfiletoobserve(warn-only) orstrict(block-all), or tune any individual control — see Runtime security.
Demo
See the whole thing in action — a server crashing mid-session and healing itself:
npm run demoIt boots Bastion in front of a server that crashes on command, shows the agent getting an actionable
"reconnect" message instead of a cryptic error, and then the connection auto-recovering with no human
involved. To record it as a GIF: asciinema rec demo.cast -c "npm run demo" && agg demo.cast assets/demo.gif.
Control tools
Bastion injects control tools so the agent can manage connections and review security itself, using only standard MCP calls:
Tool | Purpose |
| Health of every proxied server: connected / disconnected / reconnecting / failed, tool counts, last error. |
| Reconnect a named server (argument: |
| Per-tool security report: pin status (approved vs changed), poisoning findings, and shadowing. |
| Audit summary of recent activity mapped to NIST AI RMF / OWASP LLM Top 10 (requires |
Re-approval is operator-only. Clearing a rug-pull block is a security authority, so it is not an agent-callable tool — a prompt-injected agent must not be able to re-approve the very tool it was blocked from. A changed tool stays blocked until an operator clears it out-of-band;
bastion__approveis not advertised and a client call to it is refused.
Configuration
Key | Type | Default | Description |
| map | — | Upstream servers to proxy (required, at least one). |
| string | — | Executable to launch (e.g. |
| string[] |
| Arguments to |
| map | — | Env overrides merged over the process env. |
| string | — | Working directory for the spawned process. |
| boolean |
| Auto-reconnect after an unexpected disconnect. |
| number |
| Max attempts before giving up ( |
| number |
| Initial backoff, doubled each attempt. |
| number |
| Backoff ceiling. |
| boolean |
| Enable periodic liveness probing. |
| number |
| Interval between probes. |
| number |
| Per-probe timeout. |
|
|
| How upstream tool names are exposed. |
| string |
| Separator used by the |
| boolean |
| Pin tool definitions and detect later changes. |
|
|
| Action when a pinned tool's definition changed. |
| boolean |
| Run poisoning heuristics on tool descriptions. |
|
|
| Action on a high-severity poisoning finding. |
| boolean |
| Record an audit event for every tool call. |
|
|
| How tool arguments are recorded. |
| boolean |
| Hash-chain events so tampering is detectable. |
| array | console | Destinations: |
|
|
| Local subprocess or remote endpoint. |
| string | — | Remote MCP URL (required for |
| map | — | Headers for |
|
|
| Serve Bastion over stdio or Streamable HTTP. |
| string / number |
| Bind address for |
| boolean |
| Reject |
| number (ms) |
| Ceiling on upstream |
|
|
| Era negotiation per upstream (probe 2026-07-28, fall back; or pin). |
|
|
| Serve pre-2026-07-28 clients statelessly, or refuse them ( |
| boolean |
| Gate |
|
|
| Action on a high-severity MRTR finding ( |
| string (≥16) | random per process | HMAC key sealing |
| number |
| Lifetime of a sealed |
Transports
Bastion runs on the MCP TypeScript SDK 2.0 and speaks both protocol eras — the stateless
2026-07-28 revision and the pre-2026 initialize handshake — on both faces, per upstream and per
client. When the protocol is stateless, the gateway is the only component that can still hold security
state, which is why v1.0 adds requestState custody and an input_required consent gate (see
CHANGELOG.md).
Bastion speaks two transports on both faces:
stdio (default) — the client spawns Bastion, and Bastion spawns local servers.
Streamable HTTP — connect to remote MCP servers (
servers.<name>withtransport: "http", aurl, and optional authheaders), and/or serve Bastion over HTTP to multiple/remote clients (listen.mode: "http", or--http <port>).
HTTP upstreams configured without an authentication header are flagged (authenticated: false) in
bastion__status and warned at connect time.
Runtime security
New in v0.2. Bastion adds a security layer in the tool-call path (an interceptor pipeline), enabled by default:
Rug-pull detection (tool pinning). Each tool's definition is pinned on first use. If a server later changes that definition, the tool is blocked (
onRugPull: "block") until an operator reviews it and re-approves it out-of-band (operator-only — not an agent-callable tool). This catches a server that looks benign at install time and turns malicious afterward.Poisoning inspection. Tool names and descriptions are scanned for manipulation heuristics (instruction override, secret access, data exfiltration, covert instructions, embedded directives, hidden/zero-width characters). Because heuristics can false-positive, the default is
warn(logged and reported, not blocked); setonPoisoning: "block"to enforce.Shadowing. When two servers expose a tool with the same name, it's surfaced in the report.
Review everything with the bastion__security tool. These checks apply to local stdio servers today;
authentication checks for remote servers arrive with HTTP transport support.
Audit & compliance
New in v0.3, opt-in. Enable audit to record a structured, versioned event for every tool call —
including calls blocked by the security layer:
"audit": {
"enabled": true,
"includeArgs": "redacted", // none | redacted | full
"tamperEvident": true, // integrity hash-chain (detects naive edits; unkeyed, not signed)
"sinks": [
{ "type": "file", "path": "./bastion-audit.jsonl" },
{ "type": "webhook", "url": "https://collector.example/v1/audit" }
]
}Pluggable sinks.
console(stderr JSONL),file(JSONL append),webhook(batched POST), andotlp(native OpenTelemetry logs export — point it at an OTel Collector to fan out to any SIEM/cloud backend). The sink interface makes new destinations additive.Compliance mapping. Each event is mapped to NIST AI RMF functions and OWASP LLM Top 10 categories;
bastion__compliancereturns an aggregate report of recent activity.Integrity hash chain. With
tamperEvident, events are linked by a SHA-256 hash chain, and the exportedverifyChainhelper detects naive or partial edits within an intact log. The chain is unkeyed: a party who can rewrite the log file can recompute a consistent chain, and truncating the most-recent events links cleanly — so treat this as corruption-detection, not cryptographic tamper-proofing. For stronger guarantees, ship events to an append-only external sink (webhook / OTLP → a WORM store or SIEM). Keyed/signed attestation is on the roadmap.Redaction (best-effort). Arguments are omitted by default;
includeArgs: "redacted"keeps structure while masking values under known credential key-names and common secret patterns. It is a heuristic, not a guarantee — a secret under an unrecognized key can still be recorded, so prefernonefor high-sensitivity deployments.
Standards alignment
Every security check maps to recognized frameworks — the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (a U.S. federal standard), the OWASP Top 10 for LLM (2025) and Agentic (2026) Applications, and STRIDE. The full per-check mapping (with reference links to the MCP-security literature the checks are drawn from) is in docs/CHECKS-MAPPING.md.
Coverage is measured independently — bastion is scored against a 22-vector attack surface by the vendor-neutral mcp-defense-bench benchmark, with a public leaderboard and framework mapping.
Client setup
The steps are identical for every client — only the config file location differs:
Client | Where to add the |
Claude Code | project |
Cursor |
|
Claude Desktop |
|
Cline |
|
Windsurf |
|
Gradual adoption: you don't have to route every server through Bastion — put only your flaky or untrusted servers behind it and leave the rest connected directly.
Architecture
Bastion is organized into clear layers with a one-directional dependency flow, so each concern is independently testable and easy to evolve:
src/
├── cli.ts # thin CLI entrypoint (parse → wire → serve)
├── index.ts # public library API
├── errors.ts # error hierarchy (BastionError, …)
├── config/ # schema (Zod) + loader
├── core/ # domain: upstream connection lifecycle, aggregation & routing
├── proxy/ # client-facing MCP server + control tools
├── observability/ # logging (audit sinks in v0.3)
└── internal/ # small cross-cutting utilitiesDesign details — including the client-agnostic rationale, the interceptor pipeline, and the audit-sink strategy — live in the project's design docs.
Development
npm install
npm run check # format:check + lint + typecheck + test (the full gate)
npm test # unit + end-to-end (in-memory transport) tests
npm run build # bundle to dist/ (CLI + library)
npm run dev -- --config bastion.config.jsonScript | Does |
| Bundle CLI + library with |
| Run the CLI from source with |
|
|
| ESLint (flat config). |
| Prettier. |
| Vitest. |
| Everything above, as one gate. |
Roadmap
Version | Theme | Highlights |
v0.1 ✅ | Reliability | Aggregating proxy, auto-reconnect, |
v0.2 ✅ | Runtime security | Tool-definition pinning (rug-pull detection), poisoning inspection, shadowing detection. |
v0.3 ✅ | Audit & compliance | Pluggable audit sinks (console / file / webhook), NIST AI RMF / OWASP LLM Top 10 mapping. |
Both stdio and Streamable HTTP transports are supported (see Transports).
Contributing
Contributions are very welcome — this project is built to be community-owned. Please read CONTRIBUTING.md for the dev setup, project layout, and PR workflow, and our Code of Conduct.
In short: open an issue for non-trivial changes, keep PRs focused with tests, and make sure
npm run check passes (CI runs it on Node 18/20/22). Good first areas: additional client setup
recipes, more upstream test fixtures, and Streamable HTTP transport support.
Security
mcp-bastion is security-adjacent software, so we hold it to a high bar. Please report
vulnerabilities privately — do not open a public issue. See SECURITY.md for
the disclosure process.
License
Apache-2.0 © Gowthaman Arumugam and mcp-bastion contributors
Available Tools
2 toolsbastion__approveA
Re-approve a tool whose definition changed, clearing a rug-pull block so it can be called again. Only do this after reviewing and trusting the change.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tool | Yes | The tool's original (un-namespaced) name. | |
| server | Yes | Server that owns the tool. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It clearly explains the effect (clears a block to allow calling the tool again). Could mention if approval requires specific permissions, but sufficiently transparent for the action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two succinct sentences that front-load the purpose and condition. No extraneous words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given low complexity (2 required params, no output schema, single sibling), the description covers what the tool does, when to use it, and its effect completely.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description does not add extra meaning to parameters beyond schema definitions (tool name, server name). No enrichment needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool re-approves a tool after a definition change, clearing a rug-pull block. It distinguishes from the sibling 'bastion__compliance' by its specific action (re-approve vs. compliance).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicit condition 'Only do this after reviewing and trusting the change' guides when to use. Does not explicitly mention when not to use, but context is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
bastion__complianceA
Report an audit/compliance summary of recent tool activity, mapped to governance frameworks (NIST AI RMF functions and OWASP LLM Top 10 categories). Requires audit to be enabled.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description bears full burden. It mentions the output is a summary mapped to frameworks, but does not disclose whether the tool is read-only, any side effects, authentication needs, or rate limits. The behavioral transparency is minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It conveys the purpose, mapping, and prerequisite efficiently, achieving maximum conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is fairly complete. It states what the tool does and a key requirement. However, it lacks detail on what 'recent tool activity' means or the format of the summary, leaving some ambiguity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and the schema coverage is 100% (empty schema). Per guidelines, baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable given no parameters exist.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it reports an audit/compliance summary of recent tool activity, mapped to specific governance frameworks (NIST AI RMF and OWASP LLM Top 10). It distinguishes from the sibling 'bastion__approve' by focusing on compliance reporting rather than approval actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly notes that audit must be enabled, providing a clear prerequisite. It implies when to use (when an audit summary is needed), but does not explicitly state when not to use or list alternatives beyond the sibling tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
v0.6.3- First observed
bastion__approve - First observed
bastion__compliance
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools serve completely distinct purposes: one for re-approving changed tools to prevent rug-pull, the other for reporting audit/compliance summaries. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
Both tools follow a consistent 'bastion__<verb>' naming pattern (bastion__approve, bastion__compliance), making the action clear and predictable.
With only 2 tools, the server feels slightly thin, but for a focused governance purpose (rug-pull prevention and compliance reporting), the count is reasonable and not inappropriate.
The tools cover the core functions: approving changed tools and reporting compliance. Minor gaps exist, such as listing pending approvals or configuring audit settings, but the surface is adequate for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
- gatewayOAuthai.sealgate
MCP gateway with runtime security policy, tool-call-level control, and audit of agent actions.
Governed MCP gateway: one endpoint for your tools, with credential custody and audit log.
Security & DLP proxy for MCP: tool-poisoning scans, PII redaction on tool args/results. Beta.
Guarded MCP server for agent-readable business truth, provenance, readiness, and discovery.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn enterprise infrastructure layer for the Model Context Protocol that provides authentication, RBAC, audit logging, and rate limiting for tool calls. It acts as a secure proxy between AI agents and MCP servers to ensure security and compliance in production environments.13 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA security proxy and active firewall for the Model Context Protocol that protects host systems from malicious intent, prompt injection, and data exfiltration. It acts as an interception layer between AI agents and tools, providing real-time verification and multi-layered defense mechanisms.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides a secure gRPC transport layer for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) with mutual TLS, token-based authentication, and fine-grained authorization. Includes comprehensive telemetry and a real-time visualization dashboard for monitoring AI model interactions and security events.1Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables unified access to multiple MCP backend servers through one local daemon, with curated per-client tool profiles, allow/deny policies, audit logging, and drift protection.13 npm1-