Skip to main content
Glama
Gowsi31

sql-mcp

by Gowsi31

Related Servers

Alternatives to sql-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Security-first, read-only MCP server for Microsoft SQL Server, enabling safe natural-language querying of databases.
      5
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for Microsoft SQL Server that retrieves connection details from AWS Secrets Manager, enabling database exploration and querying via natural language.
      12
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only SQL Server MCP server enabling safe database queries, table listing, and schema inspection with built-in security protections.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only, guarded access to business databases via MCP. Enables natural language querying with built-in security barriers like table allowlists, PII masking, and audit logging.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only Microsoft SQL Server database access to AI agents with row-level security, enabling SELECT queries, table metadata, and schema introspection through MCP.
      12 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that enables users to query Databricks SQL, browse metadata, and monitor Delta Lake tables. It also supports tracking Databricks Jobs, DLT Pipelines, and cluster metrics through natural language interfaces.
      25
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: list_tables returns the table list, describe_table provides schema for one table, list_databases shows configured connections, and query executes arbitrary SELECT statements. There's no overlap; an agent can easily determine which tool to use for a given task.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The first three tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (list_tables, describe_table, list_databases). The fourth tool, 'query', is a single verb and doesn't fit the pattern cleanly, but it's still intuitive and not confusing.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose. Each tool is essential for database exploration and querying, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range. The small number avoids redundancy and keeps the interface focused.

    Completeness5/5

    For a read-only SQL query server, the surface is complete: list databases to see connections, list tables, describe a table's schema, and run arbitrary SELECT queries. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose, and the read-only constraint is explicit.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues