A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceTurn your typed TypeScript functions into an MCP server — tool, resource, and prompt schemas inferred from your types and JSDoc. No schema library, no decorators, no boilerplate.
9 npm
MIT
Payload MCP
by Govcraft
Related Servers
Alternatives to Payload MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAggregates tools from multiple MCP servers, generates TypeScript definitions, and executes custom TypeScript scripts to orchestrate cross-server tool calls.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that integrates with Swagger/OpenAPI specifications to expose API endpoints as tools for Large Language Models (LLMs), enabling natural language interaction with any OpenAPI-compliant API.49MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAutomatically generates MCP tools, CLI, and web UI from TypeScript methods, enabling AI agents and chat clients to interact with custom capabilities defined once.29 npm100MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables building and running an MCP server with automatically discovered tools, prompts, and resources over HTTP or STDIO, using TypeScript and Zod schemas.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProxy MCP server that translates tool calls into TypeScript code generation, enabling LLMs to orchestrate multi-tool workflows efficiently via code.1 npm14MIT
TDQS
D1.4/5.0
Scored across 43 tools
Disambiguation1/5
All tools are named with 'create' prefix and lack descriptions, making it impossible to distinguish between similar concepts like field types (createTextField vs createArrayField) and hooks (createAfterChangeHook vs createBeforeChangeHook). This leads to high ambiguity and likely misselection by agents.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent 'create_xxx' pattern (verb_noun), with 'create' as the sole verb. This uniformity makes the naming predictable despite the lack of descriptions.
Tool Count2/5
43 tools is excessive for a server focused solely on creation operations. Many tools cover highly specific field types and hooks that could be consolidated, resulting in an overly large and unwieldy tool surface for the apparent scope.
Completeness1/5
The tool set exclusively supports creation operations, with no tools for reading, updating, deleting, or listing entities. This represents a severe gap in lifecycle coverage, making the server incomplete for typical CMS workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues