codex-app-server-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to codex-app-server-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA stdio MCP server that lets Claude Code delegate coding tasks to an OpenCode instance (optionally attached to an internal LLM gateway), with follow-up replies, status polling, output/diff retrieval, cancellation, and cleanup handled in a single session. It supports managed or attach modes, sandbox and approval policies, parallel fan-out delegations, and read-only review workflows.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceUse Codex as a subagent inside Claude Code: async dispatch into a long-lived codex app-server, results pushed back into the Claude session automatically, steer/interrupt mid-task, and Codex's built-in code review.61MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to delegate tasks to OpenAI's Codex CLI (GPT-5.4) with structured execution traces, parallel execution, session persistence, and adversarial code review.15MIT
- FlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables Codex to delegate already-scoped coding tasks to Claude Code and manage the resulting execution and fresh read-only review sessions, returning deterministic PASS/FAIL results through a local MCP interface.715-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables Claude Code to delegate code generation and debugging to OpenAI Codex, with stall detection and auto-recovery.224 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to delegate coding tasks—investigation, review, long-running background jobs, and optional file edits—to a locally installed OpenAI Codex CLI, with the model and reasoning effort chosen per task and read-only execution by default. Follow-up requests reuse Codex's existing context, and write-enabled delegations can be confined to a managed git worktree so the user's own checkout stays untouched.861 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct action in the Codex thread lifecycle. codex_run, codex_wait, and codex_status have explicit boundaries described in their docs, and codex_respond vs codex_steer are differentiated as answering blocked requests versus adding live instructions. No overlapping purposes that would cause misselection.
All tools use a consistent codex_ prefix with lower snake_case and a predictable verb/noun pattern. Names are immediately readable and follow the same convention throughout.
10 tools is well-scoped for managing Codex agent sessions. Each tool covers a necessary operation—run, wait, status, interrupt, review, compact, models, threads, respond, steer—without redundancy.
The surface covers a full agent-session lifecycle: start/continue, monitor, wait, interrupt, respond, steer, review, compact, and list models/threads. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit thread deletion/archival or full transcript retrieval, but core workflows are covered.