get_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only says 'gets details' without disclosing behavioral traits such as read-only nature, required permissions, rate limits, or side effects. Minimal insight into what the tool does beyond its basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Ultra-concise single sentence with no fluff. Every word is necessary and informative. Structure is optimal for quick comprehension.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and no annotations. Description does not specify what 'details' are returned, which data fields to expect, or pagination/extensibility. For a simple get-by-ID tool, it lacks context about response shape and completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage with a single parameter 'id' described as 'Numeric version ID'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema, but schema coverage is high, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action ('Gets details') and the resource ('version'), and includes the scope ('by its ID'). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like list_project_versions (which retrieves all) and create_version (which creates).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_issue or get_project. No context about prerequisites, constraints, or when not to use it. The description merely states function without usage strategy.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.