Langflow Document Q&A Server
The Langflow Document Q&A Server allows you to query documents with natural language prompts. With this server, you can:
Query Documents: Search through documents by providing natural language queries using the
query_docstoolRetrieve Answers: Get responses based on document content and your provided query
Langflow Integration: Connect to a Langflow backend that processes and responds to queries
Configurable API Endpoint: Set custom Langflow API endpoints via environment variables
MCP Compliance: Integrate seamlessly with tools like Claude Desktop through Model Context Protocol
Debugging Support: Use tools like the MCP Inspector for troubleshooting server communications
Enables document question-answering capabilities by connecting to a Langflow backend, allowing users to upload documents and query them using natural language through a Langflow Document Q&A Flow.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Langflow Document Q&A Serverwhat are the key findings in the quarterly report?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Langflow-DOC-QA-SERVER
A Model Context Protocol server for document Q&A powered by Langflow
This is a TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a document Q&A system. It demonstrates core MCP concepts by providing a simple interface to query documents through a Langflow backend.
Prerequisites
1. Create Langflow Document Q&A Flow
Open Langflow and create a new flow from the "Document Q&A" template
Configure your flow with necessary components (ChatInput, File Upload, LLM, etc.)
Save your flow
2. Get Flow API Endpoint
Click the "API" button in the top right corner of Langflow
Copy the API endpoint URL from the cURL command Example:
http://127.0.0.1:7860/api/v1/run/<flow-id>?stream=falseSave this URL as it will be needed for the
API_ENDPOINTconfiguration
Related MCP server: Chalee MCP RAG
Features
Tools
query_docs- Query the document Q&A systemTakes a query string as input
Returns responses from the Langflow backend
Development
Install dependencies:
npm installBuild the server:
npm run buildFor development with auto-rebuild:
npm run watchInstallation
To use with Claude Desktop, add the server config:
On MacOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
On Windows: %APPDATA%/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"langflow-doc-qa-server": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"/path/to/doc-qa-server/build/index.js"
],
"env": {
"API_ENDPOINT": "http://127.0.0.1:7860/api/v1/run/480ec7b3-29d2-4caa-b03b-e74118f35fac"
}
}
}
}Installing via Smithery
To install Document Q&A Server for Claude Desktop automatically via Smithery:
npx -y @smithery/cli install @GongRzhe/Langflow-DOC-QA-SERVER --client claudeEnvironment Variables
The server supports the following environment variables for configuration:
API_ENDPOINT: The endpoint URL for the Langflow API service. Defaults tohttp://127.0.0.1:7860/api/v1/run/480ec7b3-29d2-4caa-b03b-e74118f35facif not specified.
Debugging
Since MCP servers communicate over stdio, debugging can be challenging. We recommend using the MCP Inspector, which is available as a package script:
npm run inspectorThe Inspector will provide a URL to access debugging tools in your browser.
📜 License
This project is licensed under the MIT License.
Available Tools
1 toolquery_docsC
Query the document Q&A system with a prompt
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | The query prompt to search for in the documents |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions querying a 'document Q&A system', which implies a read-only operation, but doesn't specify behavioral traits like response format, error handling, rate limits, or authentication needs. The description is too minimal to provide adequate transparency for safe and effective use.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence: 'Query the document Q&A system with a prompt'. It's front-loaded and efficiently conveys the core action without unnecessary words. However, it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness, such as by specifying the system's purpose or output type.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (a query tool with no annotations and no output schema), the description is incomplete. It lacks details on what the tool returns, how results are formatted, any limitations, or error conditions. Without annotations or an output schema, the description should provide more context to help the agent understand the tool's behavior and outcomes, but it falls short.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, with the 'query' parameter documented as 'The query prompt to search for in the documents'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond this, as it doesn't elaborate on query syntax, examples, or constraints. With high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate, as the description doesn't compensate but also doesn't detract.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the tool 'Query the document Q&A system with a prompt', which provides a basic verb ('Query') and resource ('document Q&A system'), making the purpose somewhat clear. However, it's vague about what 'document Q&A system' entails and doesn't specify the scope or type of documents, leaving room for ambiguity. Without sibling tools, it doesn't need differentiation, but the purpose could be more specific.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool, such as what types of queries it supports, prerequisites, or limitations. It simply states the action without context, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name and parameters alone. This lack of explicit or implied guidelines reduces its helpfulness in selecting the tool appropriately.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool 'query_docs' has a clear and distinct purpose for querying documents, so agents cannot misselect among multiple options.
The naming is trivially consistent as there is only one tool. It follows a verb_noun pattern ('query_docs'), which is clear and predictable, and there are no other tools to cause inconsistency or mixed conventions.
The tool count is too low for a server with the apparent scope of a 'Document Q&A Server'. A single query tool feels thin and incomplete, as it lacks supporting operations like document upload, management, or retrieval, which are typical for such a domain.
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for a document Q&A system. While 'query_docs' allows querying, there are obvious gaps such as no tools for adding, updating, deleting, or listing documents, which are essential for a functional document management and query workflow.
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Ingest, manage, and retrieve documents for RAG-powered AI applications
Query any docs site via MCP. Submit a URL, ask questions, get cited answers.
Retrieve information from the Medusa documentation to assist you with your Medusa development.
Search the Cerebrium docs: deployment, cerebrium.toml, hardware, endpoints. Also sends feedback.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables semantic search and question-answering over FAQ documents using RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) with OpenAI embeddings and in-memory vector similarity.
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) capabilities with document processing, vector storage, and intelligent Q\&A using OpenAI embeddings and semantic search.
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables uploading, organizing, and semantically searching documents with support for various file types and embedding providers.27MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables document-based Q&A with multi-modal RAG, hybrid retrieval, knowledge graph reasoning, and multi-agent orchestration via MCP tools.4MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/GongRzhe/Langflow-DOC-QA-SERVER'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server