mcp-overleaf
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-overleaf
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Overleaf projects directly, including creating projects, managing files, and editing documents in real-time using Overleaf's native Operational Transformation protocol.10-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, edit, and compile LaTeX documents in Overleaf projects with tracked changes via the Model Context Protocol.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, edit, upload, compile, and manage projects in a self-hosted Overleaf Community Edition via MCP, while also providing a git remote for cloning and pushing changes.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, edit, and compile LaTeX projects on Overleaf using session cookie authentication, bypassing the need for a paid plan.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, write, compile, and manage Overleaf projects through MCP, including file operations, project administration, and LaTeX compilation diagnostics.165 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI clients to read and edit Overleaf projects through the official git bridge, with local staging of changes and conflict detection before publishing.69 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct actions across session, file, compile, and publish workflows. The only minor ambiguity is between connector_status and workflow_status, both of which report state but from different perspectives.
The majority of tool names follow a clear verb_noun pattern like begin_edit_session, read_report_file, and confirm_publish. The exceptions are connector_status and workflow_status, which use an object_status pattern, creating a small inconsistency.
Ten tools is well-scoped for a Git-to-Overleaf synchronization and publishing workflow. Each tool contributes a distinct step in the lifecycle without unnecessary redundancy.
The core workflow is well covered: session lifecycle, file read/write, compilation, preview, and publish confirmation are all present. Minor gaps include no explicit delete-file or conflict-resolution tool, though the write tool and status reporting partially mitigate this.