Algorand MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Algorand MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server providing 50+ tools for Algorand blockchain development, including account management, asset operations, smart contracts, API integration, swap functionality, and advanced transaction capabilities.13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides tools and resources for AI agents to interact with the Algorand blockchain.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for question.market prediction markets on Algorand. Enables market browsing, wallet onboarding, and trading through natural language.138MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server with 12 tools enabling AI agents (Claude, ChatGPT) to manage Algorand-based subscriptions, including locking funds in vaults and automated payments.4-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis server provides a standardized framework using the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to seamlessly integrate and manage diverse tools, enabling features like Twitter automation, cryptocurrency updates, and ElizaOS interaction.2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAlchemy's official MCP Server. Allow AI agents to interact with Alchemy's blockchain APIs.9716888MIT
TDQS
Scored across 120 tools
The tool set has clear groupings (Alpha Arcade, API calls, core utilities, wallet operations) with distinct purposes within each group, but there is significant overlap across groups, such as multiple swap quote tools (api_haystack_get_swap_quote, api_tinyman_get_swap_quote) and redundant encoding/decoding functions (encode_obj/decode_obj, encode_uint64/decode_uint64). This can lead to confusion for agents when selecting the appropriate tool for a given task, especially without clear domain separation in naming.
Naming conventions are highly inconsistent across the tool set. There is a mix of prefixes (alpha_, api_, wallet_), inconsistent use of underscores (e.g., api_algod_get_account_info vs. make_payment_txn), and varying verb styles (e.g., create_account vs. wallet_add_account). Some tools use full words (e.g., assign_group_id), while others are abbreviated (e.g., mdk_to_mnemonic). This lack of a unified pattern makes the tool set harder to navigate and predict.
With 120 tools, the count is extremely high and feels overwhelming for a single server. This suggests poor scoping, as many tools could be consolidated or grouped into sub-servers. The sheer volume makes it difficult for agents to efficiently discover and use the right tools, indicating a significant mismatch between the number of tools and a coherent, manageable interface.
The tool set appears highly comprehensive for the Algorand ecosystem, covering core blockchain operations (transactions, accounts), API integrations (algod, indexer, NFD, Pera, Tinyman, Haystack), Alpha Arcade trading, and wallet management. There are no obvious major gaps, as it supports a wide range of actions from basic utilities to advanced DeFi interactions, though the extreme breadth may dilute focus rather than indicate incompleteness.