gluedly_trigger_scrape

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses the triggering action but does not explain side effects, whether the scrape is asynchronous, whether it returns a snapshot, or whether it overwrites existing data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no filler. The core action is front-loaded and immediately understandable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter trigger tool, the description gives enough for the agent to understand the action and target resource. It could be improved with post-trigger behavior, but the basic invocation context is complete enough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already fully documents page_id as an integer and 'Gluedly page ID' with 100% coverage. The description adds only 'specific' to the parameter context, providing limited additional meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb, 'Trigger', and a clear resource, 'web scrape execution for a specific Gluedly page ID'. This makes it immediately distinguishable from sibling tools like list_pages and get_snapshot, which imply read/list operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The context is implied: use this when an immediate scrape of a known Gluedly page is needed. However, the description does not explicitly state when to avoid this tool, what prerequisites exist, or how it relates to list_pages and get_snapshot as an alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.