defillama-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to defillama-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to access DeFi data via DefiLlama API, including protocol TVL, chain TVL, token prices, and stablecoin information.79MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceReal-time DeFi data for AI agents. Provides yields, TVL, prices, DEX volumes, fees, and contract data via 8 MCP endpoints, powered by DeFiLlama.-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProvides access to DeFi Llama's free API for querying protocol TVL, chain TVL, yields, stablecoins, bridges, DEX volumes, and fees through natural language.814 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with DefiLlama's DeFi data aggregator, providing access to TVL, DEX volumes, protocol statistics, and more via the Model Context Protocol.236 npm3ISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying DeFi yield pool data and risk signals from DefiLlama, including APY, TVL, exploit history, and a gate-then-score risk assessment for curated protocols.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn x402 pay-per-call proxy for DefiLlama's MCP tools, allowing AI agents to pay USDC per tool call (up to 10 tools) without needing a DefiLlama account or subscription.4-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct data type: chain TVL, protocol search, protocol details, token prices, yield pools, and stablecoins. There is no meaningful overlap between them; even search_protocols and get_protocol are clearly separated as discovery vs. detail lookup.
All tools use the verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores: get_chains_tvl, get_protocol, get_token_prices, get_yield_pools, get_stablecoins, and search_protocols. The naming is uniform and predictable.
With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped and covers the primary DeFi data categories without being bloated or sparse. Each tool earns its place as a core query type for the DefiLlama domain.
The server covers the main data surfaces of DefiLlama: chain TVL, protocol info, token prices, yields, and stablecoins. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of historical data or single-chain TVL endpoints, but the current scope covers common use cases well.