Skip to main content
Glama
GiulioDER

RE-call MCP Memory Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to RE-call MCP Memory Server

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A personal memory MCP server that ingests AI agent conversation logs from multiple platforms into a searchable PostgreSQL+pgvector database, enabling cross-session recall of past reasoning and decisions.
    6
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server that adds a trust layer to AI agent memory, enforcing independent review and tamper-evident audit chains for any memory store. It provides tools to search, get, propose, and promote memories under governance rules.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server providing cognitive memory tools (remember, recall, think, etc.) for AI agents, enabling forgetting, consolidation, and contradiction detection.
    174
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for brainmem, providing memory search, write, outcome, explain, and status tools to give LLM agents auditable long-term memory. It prioritizes failures, gates writes on surprise, and supports validity intervals for beliefs.
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Self-hosted MCP server that gives coding agents persistent, code-aware memory with structural graph recall and blast-radius planning. It links experiential decisions to code locations and provides honest measurement instruments.
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server providing persistent memory for AI agents, enabling them to read, write, and query memories across sessions.
    9
    7 npm
    MIT
  • -
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    Not graded
    maintenance
    A sophisticated MCP server providing advanced memory capabilities with RAG, hallucination detection, and enterprise-grade AI infrastructure for intelligent agent ecosystems.
    -

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation4/5

recall_search and recall_evidence both retrieve memory, but the descriptions clearly separate them: search is for consulting and guidance, evidence is specifically for answering with citations. The other tools (index, stats, forget) are distinct. Some initial confusion between search and evidence is possible, though the explicit 'use this instead of' note mitigates it.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools share the consistent `recall_` prefix with lowercase snake_case. The second part is mostly a verb (search, index, forget) with a couple of nouns (evidence, stats), but the uniform prefix and style make the pattern highly predictable. There is no mixed casing or arbitrary naming.

Tool Count5/5

Five tools form a well-scoped set for a memory server: create (index), read (search, evidence, stats), and delete (forget). This is within the ideal 3-15 range and every tool serves a distinct lifecycle need without bloat.

Completeness5/5

The memory lifecycle is fully covered: index ingests files, search and evidence retrieve with different output formats, stats checks freshness, and forget handles deletion (with re-indexing providing update semantics). There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose of a personal memory server.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive