Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Twin Me Up

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to execute actions under an accountability layer with identity passports, mandates, a permission gate, and a tamper-evident journal, while requiring human confirmation for irreversible operations.
      7
      177 PyPI
      5
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to obtain permission before acting and verify afterward against destination systems' own records, confirming whether the permitted work actually happened.
      5
      64 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to safely act on business backends by enforcing per-agent permissions, autonomy thresholds, human approval with review-and-edit, and full audit trails.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to propose changes, obtain human or policy approval, and safely apply them with drift checks, idempotency, verified completion, compensation, and a tamper-evident ledger.
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enforces policy controls for AI agents, including spend limits, action approvals, kill switch, scoped credentials, dry-run diffs, loop prevention, and auditable hash-chained logs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      AI permissions layer so you don't have to give your agent keys to access your apps. Manage policies for agents and approve actions you want on your phone, watch, web or desktop app.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct step in the principal-agent workflow: brief vs search vs track_record differ by scope and timing; authorise, request_approval, and approval_status form a clear sequence; decision, correction, and lesson tools are clearly separated. Descriptions make intended use unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the twin_ prefix and snake_case, which is highly consistent. However, the stems mix verb forms (authorise, search) with noun phrases (approval_status, review_queue, next_questions), so it falls short of a uniform verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the ideal 3–15 range and each maps to a distinct governance function: briefing, authorisation, approvals, decisions, corrections, lessons, and tracking. No obvious redundant or trivial tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: briefing, authorisation, approval, decision recording/amendment, corrections, lessons, and tracking. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit decision retrieval by ID or lesson confirmation tool, but these are largely handled by principal-side actions or search.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing