file_reader_mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@file_reader_mcplist files in the projects folder on my Desktop"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
file_reader_mcp
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for reading and discovering files from the local filesystem.
Current capabilities
This project now provides three MCP tools:
list_files— Lists files and folders in a given directoryFolders are shown with a trailing
/Results are sorted alphabetically
Access is restricted to paths under the allowed workspace
read_file— Reads the contents of a text fileReturns the full file content as a string
Supports files inside the allowed workspace only
search_files— Searches for files by keyword within a directory treeReturns matching file paths
Helps quickly locate relevant files
Implementation notes
The file access layer has been updated to use
pathlibinstead ofosfor a more modern and readable path handling approach.Access is still restricted to a safe allowed root for security.
Related MCP server: filesystem-mcp
Requirements
Python 3.10+
uv (recommended) or pip
Setup
uv syncRunning the server
uv run python src/server.pyThe server uses stdio transport and is meant to be configured as an MCP server in Cursor or another MCP-compatible client.
Project structure
file_reader_mcp/
├── src/
│ ├── file_access.py # Pathlib-based file access helpers
│ └── server.py # MCP server exposing list_files, read_file, and search_files
├── test/
│ └── test_os.py # Local tests for directory listing
└── pyproject.tomlAvailable Tools
3 toolslist_filesD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| directory | No | . |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
read_fileD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_path | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_filesD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | Yes | ||
| directory | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing files, reading file contents, and searching for files. No overlap or ambiguity.
All tools follow a verb_noun pattern, but read_file uses singular 'file' while list_files and search_files use plural 'files'. This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score.
Three tools is well-scoped for a file reader server. Each tool serves a core need without redundancy or bloat.
For a read-only file server, the surface covers listing, reading, and searching—all essential operations. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
An MCP server that provides read access to your cloud storage providers, bank accounts and more.
A simple MCP server built with FastMCP and python
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server to list and launch applications on MacOS1519MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP Server that enables LLMs to interact with the local filesystem.1379614MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides secure access to local file system operations.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Ggowda2004/FIle_reader_MCP_tool'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server