Skip to main content
Glama
Geomanti

agent-governance MCP server

by Geomanti
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-governance MCP server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Cybersec Toolkit

      26zl
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable clients to query the tool registry, check install status, get tool recommendations for CTF or bug-bounty work, and run installed security tools through a governed execution path.
      15
      61
      MIT

    • Accord

      edenbuilds
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a policy-controlled MCP gateway that lets agents invoke tools with explicit policies, bounded execution, scoped visibility, and decision receipts.
      MIT

    • Universal MCP Tool Framework

      ttacleinad-boop
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a reusable MCP server foundation with explicit tool registration, operation-mode separation, scope-based permissions, structured results, and built-in health/status tools.
      MIT

    • Agent MCP Gateway

      roddutra
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides per-Subagent MCP controls to any coding agent or client across all your MCPs and prevents context window waste. Loads only 3 tools instead of all your MCP Server's tool definitions. Agents discover tools on-demand, only when needed and only the servers and tools they are allowed.
      4
      46 PyPI
      41
      MIT

    • mcp-gateway

      gishwinantony
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a security and context-control layer that multiplexes multiple MCP servers behind a single endpoint, scanning tool definitions and results, enforcing authorization, rate limiting, and audit logging, and dynamically retrieving tools to manage context window usage.
      MIT

    • Easy MCP Proxy

      abrookins
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables aggregation, filtering, transformation, and composition of tools from multiple MCP servers through a single proxy with tool views.
      5
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four read_* tools each target a clearly distinct resource (issue, digest, ledger, audit log), so reads are unambiguous. draft_update and propose_issue_note are the only pair with mild overlap (both produce content concerning updates/notes), but the 'writes nothing' vs 'gated write' distinction is spelled out. An agent can reliably pick the right tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern: read_issue, read_digest, read_ledger, read_audit_log, draft_update, propose_issue_note. The verb set (read/draft/propose) maps predictably to the side-effect class of each tool.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a governance/oversight server, and each tool has a distinct, non-redundant role. Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers reading state and proposing changes, but there is no way to list issues (only read a single one), check the status of a submitted proposal, or follow a proposal through to resolution. These are notable gaps for an oversight workflow, though the read-plus-propose design is deliberately human-gated.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources