Skip to main content
Glama
Geofflew

Conversation as an App

by Geofflew

Related Servers

Alternatives to Conversation as an App

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects Claude or ChatGPT to a user's own Google Sheet ledger so they can ask about their personal finances and log new spending in natural language. Exposes tools for monthly summaries, category breakdowns, top merchants, transaction listings, budget status, and expense creation.
      2,432 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Persistent expense tracker backed by Neon Postgres with SQL tools for adding, editing, deleting, and analyzing expenses via natural language.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables recording, tracking, filtering, and analyzing personal and organizational expenses through tools for adding, listing, deleting, and summarizing expense records, along with resources for category breakdowns and summaries.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to add, retrieve, and categorize expense records through structured MCP tools, with data stored in SQLite and deployable remotely for natural-language expense management.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to ask plain-English questions about their expenses, query and compare spending, add categorized transactions, forecast future spending, and detect anomalies through natural language.
      -
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables logging, querying, and summarizing personal expenses via natural language, with tools for adding, listing, and aggregating spending by category.
      3
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct roles: summarize_spending provides an aggregate view by category, while inspect_category drills down into one category's records. There is no overlap or ambiguity in when to use each.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (summarize_spending, inspect_category), making the naming predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a server, though it may be sufficient for a narrowly scoped spending exploration surface. The set lacks any additional operations that would make it feel more robust.

    Completeness4/5

    The pair covers the core workflow of viewing a summary and then inspecting category details. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to filter by date range or search across records, but the essential exploration loop is present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues