Skip to main content
Glama
Gov Tenders & Grants MCP

Gov Tenders & Grants MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gov Tenders & Grants MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Search official US government data from any MCP client: building permits from 10 city open-data portals, federal contract opportunities from SAM.gov with contracting-officer contacts, and the CMS NPI healthcare-provider registry. Open-source TypeScript server; data delivered via Apify's pay-per-result actors using your own Apify token.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search U.S. federal contract opportunities and retrieve detailed notice or award information through read-only tools with typed filters and cost-capped Apify-backed calls.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching and filtering federal contract opportunities by keyword, agency, set-aside, NAICS, and more from any MCP client. Analyzes solicitations for small-business fit and risk, and provides reference lookups for NAICS codes, set-asides, and federal thresholds.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for US (Mississippi) and UK government procurement feeds. Search live bids and tenders and track what changed over time: deadline moves, new awards, and added documents. Tools: search_opportunities, get_opportunity, list_recent_changes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to find, score, and monitor government contract opportunities across UK, EU, and US with AI-powered relevance scoring.
      2
      103 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying SAM.gov federal contract opportunities, providing precise search, retrieval, and attachment tools with full source traceability and explicit abstention when data is absent.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are cleanly separated by geography/source (EU TED, UK Find a Tender, USAspending awards, Legistar meetings), so selection is usually obvious. The one real overlap is between govcon-opportunity-feed (SAM.gov + Grants.gov combined, delta mode) and grants-gov-scraper (Grants.gov only, search mode), which an agent could reasonably confuse when asked for US federal grants.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use a uniform 'publicrecords--<source>-<object>-scraper' kebab-case convention with a shared namespace prefix, making them predictable. The single deviation is 'govcon-opportunity-feed' (feed rather than scraper) and 'eu-ted-notices-scraper' drops the source verb, but the pattern remains readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the ideal range and each maps to a distinct data source rather than duplicating surface area. Nothing feels padded, and the set is small enough for an agent to reason over at once.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers several major jurisdictions (EU, UK, US federal opportunities/grants/awards, US city councils) but leaves obvious holes such as US state/local procurement portals and non-covered countries, and the SAM.gov/Grants.gov duplication is redundant rather than additive. It also only exposes one-shot run launchers returning dataset IDs, with no tool to fetch a specific notice by ID or page a stored dataset, creating a soft dead end for drill-down.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing