queryAptPackageStatus

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Query', which implies a read operation but does not explicitly confirm it is non-destructive, mention required permissions, or describe any side effects. This is insufficient for a tool with no annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise at one sentence, which is appropriate for a simple tool, but it sacrifices completeness. It does not include parameter details or usage context, making it marginally adequate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks critical context such as what the output looks like (no output schema), how to interpret the statuses, and when to use this tool versus sibling tools. For a simple tool it is incomplete, leaving the agent with insufficient information to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 0% for the single 'package' parameter, and the description adds no extra information about the parameter's format, constraints, or allowed values beyond what the schema provides. The description does not compensate for the lack of schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Query' and clearly states the resource 'package status' (installed, available, upgradable). It distinguishes the tool from sibling tools that perform actions like install, remove, or hold packages.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for checking package status but does not provide explicit when-to-use guidance, exclusions, or mention of alternative tools like listing upgradable packages. The usage context is implied by the verb 'query'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.