compose_unpause

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate it is not read-only and not destructive, and the description adds that it operates on compose projects and resumes paused processes. No extra side effects are disclosed, but the basic behavior is clear and consistent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: one sentence plus a list of arguments. No redundant information. The structure is easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

All aspects are covered: purpose, parameters, defaults, and return type. No output schema exists, but the description provides a detailed return dict. No obvious gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All 4 parameters are described in the description text with their defaults and purposes, compensating for the 0% schema coverage. Each parameter's meaning is clear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Unpause') and the resource ('containers of a compose project'), with a clarifying parenthetical. It distinguishes from siblings like 'compose_pause' (opposite) and 'unpause_container' (single container).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when containers are paused and need to resume, but does not explicitly state when not to use it or compare to alternatives like 'compose_start' (which handles stopped containers).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.