Skip to main content
Glama
Gatyh
by Gatyh

Link to buy credits

create_checkout_link
Read-only

Generate a checkout link for a 3D Texel credit pack purchase. The user completes payment; the tool only provides the URL and never handles payment details.

Instructions

Returns a 3dtexel.com link where THE USER buys a credit pack and pays himself. This tool never pays and never touches payment details. Give the link to the user, then check get_balance.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bundleYes
currencyNoeur

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

readOnlyHint=true is consistent, and rather than restating it the description explains the practical consequence: the tool never pays and never touches payment details, so settlement happens out-of-band by the user. It also tells the agent the returned domain and the post-condition to verify. Link expiry or reuse rules are not covered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with what is returned and immediately followed by the key behavioral constraint. Every sentence carries information; none is filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter, no-output-schema tool, it covers the return value, the responsibility split, and the follow-up verification well. The remaining gap is parameter-level guidance for choosing a bundle and the currency default.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the burden but adds only 'credit pack' as a gloss for bundle. currency is never mentioned, and nothing explains tier selection or defaulting behavior. The enums supply valid values but no meaning, leaving a real gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: returns a checkout link where the user buys a credit pack. It distinguishes the tool's action (returns a link) from the user's action (buys and pays), which is valuable. It doesn't explicitly contrast with the nearby sibling list_credit_packs, keeping it just short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear flow guidance: hand the link to the user, then check get_balance. That names a sibling and a follow-up step. It stops short of a 5 because it never states when to choose this over list_credit_packs or what prerequisites exist for generating a link.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.