Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to omni-x402-prover

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify SHA-256 artifact digests and decode Base USDC transfer transactions, returning trustworthy PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL verdicts for paid API calls and deliverables.
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with 200 deterministic micro-services covering code auditing, 3D/robotics, media processing, cryptography, blockchain settlement, AI safety, networking, and math, with automatic x402 USDC micropayments.
      200
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and autonomous agents to intercept arithmetic and algebraic hallucinations via exact rational verification, seal multi-step reasoning chains with SHA-256 Merkle commitments, and optionally bridge deep verification to a remote sovereign enclave. It also supports BFT epistemic consensus across multi-agent proposals and tamper-evident session sealing.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run a free fail-closed preflight gate on x402 payment challenges and transactions before signing, plus five USDC-paid on-chain truth checks covering arbitrage profitability, token safety, swap routing, quote validation, and trade sizing. Each check returns a verdict with pinned-block evidence and a verifiable receipt.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access crypto prices, DeFi yields, Polymarket data, Base chain info, and security scans with pay-per-call via USDC on Base mainnet.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct resource: one free catalog/discovery call and four paid verifiers scoped to non-overlapping domains (vault rounding, Polymarket NegRisk solvency, ZK/BitVector, differential consensus). An agent can pick the right verifier from the domain keywords alone, and the free/paid split is explicit in the descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All five names share the `x402_` prefix and four use the `verify_<target>` pattern, giving a predictable structure. The lone deviation is `x402_bazaar_catalog`, which is a noun-style discovery name rather than a verb_action, but it is still readable and its role is obvious.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is tightly scoped for a specialized formal-prover service: one discovery entrypoint plus four verifiers, each covering a distinct class of proof obligation. No tool appears redundant or padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers discovery plus verification for the four advertised vulnerability classes and pricing is exposed via the catalog. Minor gaps exist: there is no tool to poll status or retrieve results/history of a submitted proof, and no generic 'verify arbitrary spec' escape hatch, which agents would need for long-running Z3 jobs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues