Skip to main content
Glama
Gastarbeiter97

PAKT MCP Server

by Gastarbeiter97
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to PAKT MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • spotdraft-mcp

      chad-hohn-radai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives Claude safety-gated access to SpotDraft contracts, enabling querying and managing contracts, templates, counterparties, obligations, and analytics through natural language.
      19
      MIT

    • Precedent

      insha-parveen
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and retrieve contract intelligence over public contract data, with agent skills for precedent lookup, negotiation checks, and risk flagging, all with verification and citations.
      -

    • ClauseLens MCP

      Jaydatta-Bade
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude or Cursor to act as a contract analyst by providing tools for document fetching, clause segmentation, span verification, and risk taxonomy lookup, with no server-side LLM calls or document retention.
      MIT

    • Aoexl Sign

      aryansingh0203
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to create, manage, and track electronic signing requests and templates through Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients. Provides multi-tenant authentication with customer API keys for secure document workflow operations.
      66 npm
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    list_contracts, get_contract, analyze_contract, and compare_amendment each target a distinct action and resource. The only mild overlap is that analyze_contract returns 'the same overview as get_contract,' which could blur read vs. upload boundaries, but their primary intents remain clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_contracts, get_contract, analyze_contract, compare_amendment. Consistent and predictable throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a tight, focused set for a contract-risk analysis server. It sits at the low end of the ideal range but each tool earns its place and none is redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows (list, read overview, upload/analyze, compare amendments with create-or-replace logic) are covered. Gaps remain around deleting contracts, updating metadata, and standalone amendment listing, but these are minor workarounds rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources