garu-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to garu-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for Stone's payment gateway, enabling AI agents to manage orders, charges, customers, subscriptions, and more via the Pagar.me API.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for the Chargily Pay V2 API, enabling payment management including customers, products, prices, checkouts, and payment links.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for PayMongo payment gateway (Philippines). Supports payment intents, sources, payments, refunds, and checkout sessions via Basic Auth.246 npm2MIT

@gravv/mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Gravv payments API that lets AI assistants onboard customers, run KYC, open accounts, move money, issue cards, and exchange currency, with built-in documentation search and safety confirmations for money-moving operations.27 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for bePaid payment gateway enabling payment operations including create, capture, void, refund, card tokenization, and subscriptions through natural language prompts.17 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for ZEN.com Payment Gateway enabling payment links, transaction lookup, refunds, payouts, and reporting.1429 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 37 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action with clear, detailed descriptions. Tools like pause_scheduled_charge and resume_scheduled_charge are complementary, not overlapping. Even similar operations like retry_webhook_event and resend_webhook_event are carefully differentiated by audit trail semantics.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case. Verbs are imperative, nouns are plural for lists and singular for single operations. Even longer names like set_cancel_at_period_end_scheduled_charge adhere to the pattern without deviation.
37 tools is on the higher end but reasonable for a comprehensive payment platform covering customers, charges, scheduled charges, products, webhooks, and setup. Each tool serves a specific purpose, though the scheduled charge cluster (13 tools) could potentially be consolidated slightly.
The tool surface is extensive, covering CRUD for customers and charges, lifecycle management for scheduled charges, and webhook handling. A notable gap is the lack of a delete_product tool, as products can only be updated or have their portal config cleared.