competition_leaderboard_download

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that the tool returns a download URL, implying no side effects. Without annotations, it adequately covers the main behavioral trait (non-destructive). Could mention authentication or rate limits, but not necessary for a simple download.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences plus a parameter description. No redundant information; front-loaded with the key action and return value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, output schema present), the description is fully adequate: it states the purpose, argument, and return value. No missing context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds meaning with 'Competition URL suffix (e.g. 'titanic')', which clarifies the parameter format beyond the schema's minimal type/string definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'download' and resource 'full competition leaderboard', and specifies the return value 'download URL'. This distinguishes it from siblings like 'competition_leaderboard' (which likely just displays the leaderboard).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implicitly indicates to use when needing to download the leaderboard. Does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use, but the context of sibling names provides sufficient differentiation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.