list_accounts
Retrieve all HuntFlow accounts you have access to. Use the account IDs to manage vacancies, candidates, and other resources.
Instructions
List of available HuntFlow accounts.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve all HuntFlow accounts you have access to. Use the account IDs to manage vacancies, candidates, and other resources.
List of available HuntFlow accounts.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavior. It only states 'list of available accounts' with no detail on pagination, ordering, authentication, or side effects. Lacks transparency for a tool with no annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence. It is concise and front-loaded, but adds no extra context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and sibling tools like list_account_sources, the description is minimal but functional. It could specify the return structure or scope (e.g., all accounts for user). Adequate but not complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters (0 params), so the input schema is trivial. The description adds the meaning 'list accounts', which suffices since baseline is 4 for zero parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List of available HuntFlow accounts' clearly states the verb (list) and resource (accounts). It is straightforward but does not differentiate from sibling tools like list_account_sources.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, filters, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Gaivoronsky/huntflow-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server