Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
profili-mcp

profili-mcp

by GaillumXc
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to profili-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Windows-MCP

      StepByStep-1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Windows operating systems through native UI automation, file navigation, application control, and system commands. Provides seamless integration between LLMs and Windows environments for tasks like clicking, typing, launching apps, and capturing desktop state.
      MIT

    • Windows-MCP

      CyanQX
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate Windows desktop via human-like mouse and keyboard input and UI Automation, with post-action verification for reliable control of programs, UI elements, windows, and files.
      5
      MIT

    • ScreenMind

      wellrccity
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect and operate Windows applications through structured UI Automation maps, humanized mouse and keyboard input, and on-demand screenshots or OCR via MCP. It supports locating elements by role, name, or query; clicking, typing, scrolling, window management, event watching, and chained multi-step actions without relying on image analysis.
      MIT

    • inspire-mcp

      zchenjun88-hash
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents on Windows to control Altair Inspire through its headless batch mode and Python API, including running scripts, inspecting models, summarizing .h3d results, and exporting OptiStruct decks without opening or touching the GUI.
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions: listing, probing, GUI lifecycle, library search, geometry retrieval, import/export, polar lookup, fresh XFOIL analysis, and geometry redesign. The only plausible confusion is between get_polar (stored polar) and analyze_airfoil (fresh computed polar), plus find_airfoils_by_polar vs search_airfoils, but the descriptions make the stored-vs-computed and name-vs-performance distinctions explicit.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_polars, get_status, search_airfoils, export_airfoil_dat, analyze_naca). Domain nouns are used uniformly, and the launch_/close_ pair is symmetric.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is squarely within the well-scoped range and each tool maps to a distinct capability (inspection, GUI control, library CRUD-ish operations, aerodynamics analysis). No obvious filler or redundant tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers discovery, inspection, geometry access, import/export, polar analysis, and geometry modification, which covers the main airfoil-database workflows. Notable gaps are deletion/rename of library airfoils and any library-creation operation, though these are safely workable around via import/export.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources