Tilda MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Tilda MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides bounded, reversible control over Tilda visual editor operations, enabling coding agents to read, edit, publish, and rollback page changes with explicit identity and human approval.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server and Claude skills for AI agents to build landing pages, run A/B experiments, and track first-party conversions. Lets agents onboard clients, create and publish pages, manage variants, and pull performance reports via the UXON API.13MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables external AI agents to edit and manage a self-hosted website via a token-gated MCP server, including page content, data, media, and sandboxed functions with validation and rollback.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to draft, review, preview, and publish content across multiple websites through typed MCP tools. Ensures safe, policy-gated, and auditable publication without requiring a conventional CMS admin interface.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI coding agents to read and write to a local-first HTML/CSS design canvas, bridging visual design and code generation.1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server implementing a 7-stage agentic frontend workflow—from design audit to PR review—including AI-driven component generation, browser validation, E2E testing, and CI self-healing.44 npm-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one creates and publishes a new landing page, the other updates and republishes an existing page section. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tool names follow the same snake_case pattern: tilda_<verb>_<object>. The verbs (fast_generate, update) and objects (landing, page_section) are descriptive and consistent.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a platform like Tilda. The count is borderline acceptable but suggests a narrow scope that may not cover common use cases.
The set covers creation and modification of pages, but lacks read, delete, or listing operations. While the two included operations are core, the missing lifecycle functions are notable gaps.