Skip to main content
Glama

node_rename

Rename a TouchDesigner operator by specifying its full path and new name. Use to update node labels in live projects.

Instructions

Rename a node.

path (<class 'str'>): Full path of the operator.

name (<class 'str'>): New name for the operator.

detail (str | None): full (default) | summary (long lists cut to 25 + count) | minimal (top-level scalars only).

response_format (str | None): yaml (default, token-cheap) | json.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYes
pathYes
detailNo
response_formatNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.4.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / detail
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "title": "Detail"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_format
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "title": "Response Format"
      +}
  2. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden: it does disclose response-format behavior ('yaml (default, token-cheap) | json') and detail truncation ('long lists cut to 25 + count'). However, it does not disclose side effects of renaming, error behavior, or whether references are updated, which is important for a mutating tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One line for the operation plus one line per parameter, with no filler or repetition. Each sentence adds information, and the core action is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

All required inputs and output-format choices are specified, which is enough for an agent to invoke node_rename correctly. It is slightly incomplete only because it omits error conditions and side effects, and there is no output schema to describe the return payload.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description compensates fully: it defines path as 'Full path of the operator,' name as 'New name for the operator,' and details the allowed values/defaults for detail and response_format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Rename a node,' a specific verb plus resource, and the parameter docs confirm it changes an operator's path/name. This clearly distinguishes it from node_create, node_copy, node_get, and the other node_* siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

When to call it is implied by the verb 'rename,' but the description never states when it is or is not appropriate compared with node_copy or node_set_flags, nor does it mention prerequisites such as the node already existing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.