canva-mcp-server
canva-mcp-server
Pädagogischer MCP-Server (Model Context Protocol), der einen KI-Agenten mit der Canva Connect API verbindet. Erstellt als Unterrichtsmaterial über kreative Medien mit KI – zeigt in der Praxis, wie ein MCP-Server aufgebaut ist.
Was er tut
Stellt 3 Werkzeuge (Tools) bereit, die ein KI-Agent (Claude usw.) aufrufen kann:
Werkzeug | Was es tut |
| Sucht vorhandene Designs im Canva-Konto nach Titel |
| Erstellt ein neues leeres Design (Poster, Präsentation, Instagram-Beitrag usw.) |
| Exportiert ein Design als PNG, JPG, PDF, PPTX, GIF oder MP4 |
Related MCP server: mcp-toolbox
Projektstruktur
canva-mcp-server/
├── package.json
├── tsconfig.json
├── src/
│ ├── index.ts # ponto de entrada, registra as ferramentas
│ ├── constants.ts
│ ├── services/canva.ts # cliente HTTP + tratamento de erros da API
│ └── tools/ # uma ferramenta por arquivo
│ ├── searchDesigns.ts
│ ├── createDesign.ts
│ └── exportDesign.ts1. Abhängigkeiten installieren
cd canva-mcp-server
npm install2. Ein Canva-Access-Token erhalten
Die Canva Connect API verwendet OAuth 2.0 (Authorization Code + PKCE). Schritt für Schritt:
Rufen Sie das Canva Developer Portal auf und erstellen Sie eine App (Typ „Connect API integration“).
Notieren Sie die Client ID und das Client Secret.
Konfigurieren Sie eine Redirect-URI (für lokale Tests, etwa
http://127.0.0.1:3333/callback).Definieren Sie die erforderlichen Scopes, mindestens:
design:content:read,design:content:write,design:meta:read,asset:read.Folgen Sie dem OAuth-Ablauf von Canva (Autorisierung im Browser → Austausch des
codegegenaccess_token) – der offizielle Leitfaden ist unter https://www.canva.dev/docs/connect/authentication/. Für eine Unterrichtsstunde ist es am einfachsten, Postman/Insomnia mit dem integrierten OAuth2-Ablauf zu verwenden oder das Beispielskript des Canva Developer Portals selbst.Bewahren Sie das erhaltene
access_tokenauf (es läuft ab – für die kontinuierliche Wiederverwendung wäre die Implementierung des Refresh-Tokens erforderlich; das bleibt eine fortgeschrittene Übung für die Klasse).
3. Umgebungsvariable konfigurieren
export CANVA_ACCESS_TOKEN="seu_access_token_aqui"(Es gibt eine .env.example im Repository mit derselben Vorlage, falls Sie eine .env-Datei verwenden möchten)
4. Build und Ausführung
npm run build
npm startFür die Entwicklung mit automatischem Neuladen:
npm run dev5. Mit Claude Code / Claude Desktop verbinden
Fügen Sie zu Ihrer mcp-Konfiguration hinzu (z. B. .claude/settings.json des Projekts oder claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"canva": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/caminho/absoluto/para/canva-mcp-server/dist/index.js"],
"env": {
"CANVA_ACCESS_TOKEN": "seu_access_token_aqui"
}
}
}
}6. Mit dem MCP Inspector testen
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector node dist/index.jsDadurch wird eine Weboberfläche geöffnet, um die Werkzeuge manuell aufzurufen und die Ergebnisse zu sehen – ideal, um es im Unterricht zu demonstrieren, bevor man es mit einem echten Agenten verbindet.
Ideen für Übungen für die Klasse
Ein Werkzeug
canva_list_brand_templateshinzufügen (Markenvorlagen verwenden).Automatisches Aktualisieren des Access-Tokens implementieren.
Unterstützung für
response_formathinzufügen (Markdown vs. JSON) wie im Leitfaden für bewährte MCP-Praktiken.Den Transport von stdio auf Streamable HTTP umstellen und als Remote-Dienst ausführen.
Lizenz
Available Tools
3 toolscanva_create_designCriar Design no CanvaA
Cria um novo design em branco no Canva a partir de um preset de tipo/tamanho.
Esta é uma ferramenta de escrita: cria um recurso novo e persistente na conta do Canva do usuário.
Args:
title (string): título do design
design_type (enum): um dos presets suportados (presentation, doc, poster, instagram_post, instagram_story, facebook_post, logo, flyer)
Retorna o id do design criado e o link de edição no Canva.
Exemplos:
"Crie uma apresentação chamada 'Aula 1 - Introdução'" -> title="Aula 1 - Introdução", design_type="presentation"
Não use para gerar conteúdo com IA a partir de um prompt de texto — esta ferramenta cria apenas um design em branco
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | Título do novo design (ex: 'Poster - Aula Mídias Criativas com IA') | |
| design_type | Yes | Tipo de preset de design a criar: presentation, doc, poster, instagram_post, instagram_story, facebook_post, logo, flyer |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate a non-read-only, non-idempotent, non-destructive operation. The description adds behavioral context: clarifies it is a 'ferramenta de escrita' that creates a persistent resource and returns the design id and edit link. This aligns with annotations and enriches the agent's understanding beyond the structured hints.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with a purpose statement, write-tool note, args, return value, and examples. It is slightly redundant with the schema in the Args section, but every section adds context. Front-loads the core purpose and negative usage, making it efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with only 2 params, no output schema, and moderate annotations, the description covers the essential aspects: what it creates, parameter semantics, return value, and a key exclusion. It is complete enough for an agent to decide when and how to invoke it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and includes descriptions for both params. The description adds value by providing a natural-language example mapping ('Crie uma apresentação chamada...' -> title/design_type) and summarizing the enum values. This helps the agent understand how to translate user requests into parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Cria um novo design em branco no Canva a partir de um preset de tipo/tamanho.' This clearly differentiates from sibling tools (search, export) since creating a blank design is a distinct action. It also specifies the scope and output.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context and a when-not: 'Não use para gerar conteúdo com IA a partir de um prompt de texto — esta ferramenta cria apenas um design em branco.' It does not explicitly mention alternatives like search or export, but the primary use case and exclusion are stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
canva_export_designExportar Design do CanvaA
Exporta um design do Canva para um arquivo (PNG, JPG, PDF, PPTX, GIF ou MP4).
Cria um job de exportação assíncrono e aguarda (com polling, até ~30s) a conclusão antes de retornar.
Args:
design_id (string): id do design a exportar
format (enum): png | jpg | pdf | pptx | gif | mp4 (padrão: png)
Retorna a(s) URL(s) de download do arquivo exportado.
Exemplos:
"Exporte o design X como PDF" -> design_id="X", format="pdf"
Erros:
Se o job falhar ou exceder o tempo de espera, retorna uma mensagem explicando o que houve.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| format | No | Formato de exportação | png |
| design_id | Yes | ID do design a exportar (retornado por canva_search_designs ou canva_create_design) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds behavioral context beyond annotations: it mentions the asynchronous job, ~30s polling limit, and potential error handling. It does not contradict annotations and provides useful operational details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with sections for args, examples, and errors, and is front-loaded with purpose. It is slightly verbose but each part serves a clear function, keeping it efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Since there is no output schema, the description correctly specifies the return type (download URLs) and covers error scenarios. It is complete for a simple two-parameter tool, covering all necessary aspects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters, but the description adds value by noting that design_id comes from canva_search_designs or canva_create_design, and giving an example. This aids selection beyond the schema's basic descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it exports a Canva design to a file, listing supported formats. It distinguishes from sibling tools (search, create) by focusing on exporting, with a specific verb and resource.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It explains the export process (async job, polling, timeout) and provides a clear example, though it does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools or give when-not-to-use scenarios. The context is sufficient to infer appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
canva_search_designsBuscar Designs no CanvaARead-onlyIdempotent
Busca designs existentes na conta conectada do Canva por título.
Não cria nem modifica nada — apenas lista designs já existentes.
Args:
query (string): termo de busca, comparado com o título dos designs
limit (number): máximo de resultados (padrão 20, máx 100)
Retorna uma lista de designs com id, título e links de edição/visualização.
Exemplos:
"Encontre os designs sobre 'workshop de IA'" -> query="workshop de IA"
Não use para criar um design novo (use canva_create_design)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Número máximo de resultados a retornar | |
| query | Yes | Termo para buscar nos títulos dos designs (ex: 'poster aula IA') |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds useful context by explicitly saying it does not create or modify anything, specifying the search is by title, and disclosing the return shape (id, title, edit/view links). No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with a clear opening, non-modification note, Args section, return-value note, and examples. It is front-loaded and every sentence contributes useful information without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read-only search tool with two well-documented parameters and no output schema, the description is complete: it covers purpose, constraints, return format, examples, and an alternative tool. The robust annotations also reduce the need for additional behavioral detail.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions already explaining query and limit, so the description mostly restates this information. The example mapping and the explicit title-matching phrase add minor value but do not significantly go beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'Busca designs existentes na conta conectada do Canva por título' and clarifies it only lists existing designs. It also explicitly contrasts with canva_create_design, distinguishing it from the closest sibling.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description states when to use (search existing designs by title) and gives an explicit exclusion with alternative: 'Não use para criar um design novo (use canva_create_design)'. It also notes the tool does not modify anything, preventing misuse.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
canva_create_design - First observed
canva_export_design - First observed
canva_search_designs
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: search lists existing designs, create makes a new blank design, and export handles file conversion. There is no overlap in purpose, and the descriptions explicitly differentiate them with usage examples.
All tools follow a consistent 'canva_verb_noun' pattern: canva_search_designs, canva_create_design, canva_export_design. The snake_case convention is uniform, making it easy to predict tool names.
With only 3 tools, the server is intentionally minimal, focusing on the core lifecycle of search, create, and export. While slightly sparse, the count is reasonable for a focused integration and does not feel excessive.
The surface covers searching, creating, and exporting designs, but lacks update, delete, or get-single-design operations. This creates minor gaps for agents that need to modify or remove designs, but the core workflow is functional.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
The Canva MCP server connects AI assistants (like Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor) to Canva's API, enabling them to create and manage designs directly within chat conversations. Key capabilities include generating new designs from prompts, autofilling templates, searching and resizing existing designs, importing files from URLs, exporting designs as PDFs or images, and managing folders and comments without switching between tools.
Connect AI agents to Flato's editable canvas runtime through a hosted MCP server.
An MCP server that gives your AI access to the source code and docs of all public github repos
Official MCP server for Agentwork — delegate tasks to AI agents with human-in-the-loop
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects to Pollinations.ai API, enabling AI models to generate and download images and text through natural language commands.39Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server enabling LLMs to execute commands, manage files, interact with Figma, search the web, generate images, and more, extending their capabilities beyond text generation.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with Canva's API. It enables managing designs, brands, assets, and users through natural language.98-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Canva integration. Connect Claude Code or any MCP-compatible AI client to your Canva account to search designs, generate AI designs, edit content, manage folders, and collaborate through comments.2MIT