nginx_reload
Reload Nginx configuration to apply changes without restarting the server.
Instructions
重载 Nginx 配置
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Reload Nginx configuration to apply changes without restarting the server.
重载 Nginx 配置
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose behavioral traits (e.g., whether reload causes downtime, requires specific permissions, or how it interacts with running state).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is very concise and front-loaded, but underspecified for an agent; lacks structured guidance typical of tool descriptions.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters and no output schema, description is minimal but sufficient for a simple reload action. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like nginx_config_test or provide operational context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline score of 4 applies. Description adds no parameter information, but this is acceptable as schema covers all.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'reload' and resource 'Nginx configuration', distinguishing it from sibling tools like nginx_config_read and nginx_config_test.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., nginx_config_test before reloading), no context on prerequisites or expected conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/GT-dinuo/server-ops-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server