No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 30 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action or query type. Even the lookup tools (recall, search_memory, list_recent) have clear differentiators: recall is smart ranking, search_memory is raw faceted filtering, and list_recent is chronological listing. The save tools are clearly separated by memory kind (note, decision, solution, gotcha, pattern, handoff), and lifecycle/status/profile tools have no overlap.
Names follow snake_case with a strong verb-first pattern (save_note, log_decision, get_memory, verify_memory) but there are minor deviations such as 'why_code', 'memory_at', 'team_context', and 'latest_handoff' (non-verb leading). These are still readable and do not disrupt the overall consistency significantly.
30 tools is heavy and above the 25+ threshold. While the breadth covers many memory operations, it feels over-scoped; some tools (e.g., remember_commit_digest, git_blame_context) could be merged into broader workflows. The count likely introduces agent confusion and selection overhead.
The surface fully covers the memory lifecycle: create (save_*, log_decision), retrieve (recall, search_memory, get_memory), update (mark_superseded, verify_memory), delete (delete_memory), discovery (find_duplicates, memory_stats), provenance (entry_history, memory_at), collaboration (status, profiles, handoffs), and integration (sync_memory, pr_memory_review, git_blame_context). No critical gaps are apparent.