github-workflow-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to github-workflow-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI-powered GitHub automation by connecting Claude AI with GitHub APIs for managing issues and pull requests.-
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables Git and GitHub pull request operations through Claude AI, including repository management, branch operations, commits, and PR creation/commenting. Streamlines development workflows by providing Git commands and GitHub API integration through natural language interactions.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects Claude directly to GitHub repositories for reading code, making changes, committing, and managing branches and pull requests.48 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables to interact with GitHub repositories directly from Claude, supporting actions like viewing repos, checking status, committing and pushing changes, and managing pull requests.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceConnects Claude Desktop directly to GitHub repositories and git commands, enabling users to clone repos, check status, commit changes, push code, create repositories, and manage GitHub resources through natural conversation.256 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous Jira-to-PR workflows in Claude Code by fetching context from Jira, GitHub, Notion, and Slack, building structured prompts, and handling branch pushes, PR creation, CI polling, and task completion.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct (create_branch, create_issue, create_pr, list_labels, get_pr_review_summary). However, run_workflow subsumes commit_and_push and run_tests, potentially causing selection ambiguity. Descriptions mitigate this by specifying that run_workflow is a high-level automated workflow.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_branch, list_labels, run_tests, get_pr_review_summary). Even compound verbs like commit_and_push adhere to the pattern without mixing styles.
8 tools is well within the typical 3-15 range for a focused MCP server. Each tool serves a distinct purpose in the development workflow, from branching and committing to testing and PR creation, without unnecessary bloat.
The tool set covers the core workflow (branching, committing, testing, PR creation, issue creation) and includes supporting tools (list_labels, get_pr_review_summary). Minor gaps exist: no direct file manipulation, no delete branch, and no tools for managing PRs after creation (e.g., merge). However, the stated purpose is workflow automation, and the set is largely complete for that.