proofrelay
Related Servers
Alternatives to proofrelay
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSafety layer for autonomous DeFi agents. Scans contracts for exploit patterns, simulates transactions, blocks honeypots.46 npm1MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables proof-carrying project execution through a read-only remote MCP endpoint and WebMCP tools for managing Project Passports, task graphs, evidence-backed provider comparisons, route approvals, artifacts, verification records, and checkpoints without executing external providers.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables free, read-only checks of AI agents and MCP servers for conformance, published changes, delivery evidence, and verifiable receipts without requiring an account or API key, using public or non-personal data only.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides read-only MCP tools to list archived snapshots, retrieve methodology and proof bundles, and verify supplied evidence bundles.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes public marketplace data — offerings, screening and comparison, news, sponsor listings, and platform reference text — as typed read-only tools any MCP-compatible agent can call without an API key or account. Every response carries provenance, honest nulls for undisclosed values, and a standing disclaimer, and no registered tool can write or transact by default.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides read-only MCP tools for market snapshots, position risk, order reconciliation, and daily report previews with deterministic financial calculations, evidence chains, and audit trails.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLets an assistant read recorded production AI agent runs — steps, model and tool calls with arguments, and outcomes — along with the findings of comparison runs that checked a prompt or model change against those recordings, and verify a signed evidence bundle offline with no account or network. It is strictly read-only: no tool starts a replay or comparison, so nothing can spend money or act without a person deciding.543 PyPIApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct concern: discovery status, checkpoint recommendation, bundle verification, MCP risk scanning, and helper documentation. The descriptions cross-reference one another and specify exactly when each tool should be used, leaving little room for misselection.
All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb_object pattern: get_verifier_status, recommend_checkpoint, verify_bundle, scan_mcp_risk, describe_cli_sdk_helper. The verbs and objects are specific and predictable, with no mixed conventions or vague generic names.
With exactly 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a read-only advisory utility. Each tool earns its place by covering a separate step in the ProofRelay workflow without redundancy or unnecessary expansion.
For the server's declared read-only advisory purpose, the tool surface is complete: discovery status, checkpoint recommendation, bundle verification, MCP risk scanning, and integration guidance are all present. The descriptions clearly separate local checks from hosted verification, so there are no obvious dead ends within the intended scope.