Skip to main content
Glama
FuzzyCZX

MCP Communication Server

by FuzzyCZX
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Communication Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Example MCP SSE Server

      keepview
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables real-time communication using Server-Sent Events (SSE), providing standardized model management and resource templating capabilities.
      -

    • MCP Server

      stelang
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables multiple clients to connect simultaneously and handles basic context management and messaging with an extendable architecture.
      MIT

    • MongoDB MCP Server

      TeiNam
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A powerful Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation that provides standardized interaction with MongoDB databases, supporting complete CRUD operations, async patterns, and real-time updates via SSE.
      MIT

    • MCP REST API Server

      vinaykp
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) that provides REST API endpoints for managing and interacting with MCP resources.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one performs a mathematical operation (adding numbers), while the other handles web page interaction (opening a URL and managing WebSocket data). There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The naming is inconsistent: 'add' uses a simple verb without a noun, while 'open_web_page' follows a verb_noun pattern. This mixed convention lacks a predictable structure, though both names are readable. The inconsistency could cause minor confusion in a larger set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a 'Communication Server' domain, which typically implies broader functionality like messaging, notifications, or data exchange. The tools cover basic math and web display but lack operations for communication workflows, making the count insufficient for the apparent scope.

    Completeness1/5

    The server is severely incomplete for a communication domain. It lacks core operations such as sending/receiving messages, managing connections, or handling events. The existing tools (add and open_web_page) do not align with communication tasks, leaving significant gaps that would cause agent failures in typical use cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources