get_workspace_folder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the tool returns 'detailed information' and 'breadcrumb path' without specifying whether it is a safe read operation, what fields are included, or error conditions. Additional context on return format or permissions would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that conveys the essential purpose without unnecessary words. Every part earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only 2 parameters and no output schema, the description is mostly complete. It mentions the return includes a breadcrumb path, but 'detailed information' could be more specific. For a simple GET, it suffices, but adding typical return fields would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add any additional meaning for the parameters beyond what the schema already provides (workspaceId and folderId).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get detailed information about a folder in a workspace, including its full breadcrumb path.' It specifies the verb (Get), resource (folder in a workspace), and a distinguishing feature (breadcrumb path). This differentiates it from siblings like get_folder (generic folder) and list_workspace_folders (listing).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving specific workspace folder details, but does not explicitly state when to use this vs alternatives like get_folder or list_workspace_folders. No when-how or exclusions are mentioned, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.