local-notes-search-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to local-notes-search-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server for semantic + keyword hybrid code search. Zero external services, no API keys required.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal MCP server for semantic code search using Tree-sitter AST parsing, local embeddings, and hybrid search; enables indexing and querying codebases entirely offline.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local hybrid-search MCP server that enables coding agents to query files and folders using natural language, returning relevant code chunks with exact source paths. Everything runs on-device with no API keys or network calls.5MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal MCP server that provides semantic search (RAG) over code repositories, enabling AI clients like Claude and Gemini to access project context without manual re-upload.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server to index your codebase once and search it across AI sessions with keyword, semantic, or hybrid search, keeping all data on disk.85 npm4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA semantic code search MCP server that enables natural language queries against your codebase, supporting features like related file discovery and context expansion, all running locally.2-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role: index_directory ingests data, search_notes and ask_notes are differentiated as raw retrieval vs. LLM-synthesized answers, list_indexed_files provides observability, and remove_directory cleans up. Even the two retrieval-based tools are easy to tell apart because their outputs and purposes are explicit.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: index_directory, search_notes, list_indexed_files, ask_notes, remove_directory. There are no mixed conventions or vague generic verbs.
Five tools is a well-scoped surface for a local notes search server: ingest, search, ask, list, and remove each earn their place. The count is neither bloated nor too thin.
The index lifecycle is fully covered: create/update via index_directory, read via search_notes and ask_notes, inspection via list_indexed_files, and deletion via remove_directory. Re-indexing handles changed and removed files, so there are no obvious dead ends or missing operations.