Skip to main content
Glama
Fronesis-Labs

DCL Trust Oracle

by Fronesis-Labs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to DCL Trust Oracle

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Proofpane by Proofpane

      Proofpaneofficial

      Proofpane
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A governance proxy for AI tools — every MCP/agent tool call is policy-gated, secret-redacted, and written to a hash-chained, offline-verifiable audit trail.
      13
      MIT
    • mcp-vaara by vaaraio

      mcp-vaaraofficial

      vaaraio
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gates every AI agent tool call against your policy before it runs, then writes a hash-chained, tamper-evident record of what was decided and what happened. Anyone can verify that record offline, without your software, your systems or any key you hold.
      12
      AGPL 3.0
    • Aegis-ZK by aegis-zk

      Aegis-ZKofficial

      aegis-zk
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      On-chain trust verification for AI agent tools. Agents query skill attestations, audit levels, and risk scores before running third-party MCP servers, so you know what's safe before you execute.
      1
      -

    • Mcp-Omega-Brain

      VrtxOmega
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      AI agent provenance, trust, and auditability layer. VERITAS multi-gate scoring, Cortex approval gates, S.E.A.L. hash-chain audit ledger, and semantic RAG with cryptographic provenance tracking for every decision an agent makes.
      27
      5
      MIT

    • agent-audit-trail

      dtjohnson83
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing immutable audit logging, policy enforcement, and compliance reporting for AI agent workflows, enabling regulatory compliance and chain integrity verification.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with detailed descriptions differentiating the many evaluate_* policies. However, the overlap between fast/strict and jailbreak/jailbreak_crypto could cause misselection without careful reading.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dcl_ prefix and snake_case are consistent, and the verb-object pattern (evaluate_*, audit_*, commit) is mostly followed. Deviations include dcl_evaluate_output_sanitizer, which is a misnomer (it sanitizes, not evaluates), and dcl_pipeline_start, which doesn't follow the clean verb-object pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 18 tools, the set is larger than typical, but the server's broad scope (pre-action checks, post-action scans, crypto-specific screens, commit/receipts) justifies the count. It feels slightly heavy but not excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full audit lifecycle: pre-action evaluation, post-action scanning, sanitization, commit, and audit retrieval. The main gap is dcl_pipeline_start, which is explicitly a stub with no server-side session linking, and there's no standalone chain-integrity verification tool (only mentioned within deep audit).

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources