Skip to main content
Glama
Fromzy1

Branch Diagnostics MCP

by Fromzy1
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Branch Diagnostics MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • NetPulse

      hind77
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes live network monitoring data as Resources and diagnostic capabilities as Tools, letting AI assistants query network health conversationally.
      6
      MIT

    • kubernetes-observability-mcp

      mrafay7655
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants direct access to Kubernetes clusters for pod management and network debugging (DNS, NetworkPolicy, ingress, service mesh) and correlates Dynatrace observability with OpenTelemetry self-monitoring, which automatically ships traces, metrics, and logs to Dynatrace.
      19
      MIT

    • Wireshark MCP Server

      iflow-mcp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides AI assistants with professional-grade network analysis capabilities, combining Wireshark packet analysis, nmap scanning, and threat intelligence for enhanced network troubleshooting and security analysis.
      MIT

    • Prometheus MCP Server

      bartest5
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI assistants to query and analyze Prometheus metrics through PromQL, with support for metric discovery and authentication.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool represents a distinct step in the diagnostic funnel: categorize, find metrics, get data, and analyse. Their purposes are clearly separated with no overlap.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming is inconsistent: three tools follow a verb_noun pattern (diagnostic_categorize, find_metrics, get_data_metrics) but 'diagnostic_categorize' anomalously includes a prefix, and 'analyse' is just a verb without a noun, breaking the pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the server is appropriately scoped for a focused diagnostic pipeline. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The four tools cover the entire diagnostic funnel from symptom categorization to analysis and recommendations. Minor gaps like a reset or overview tool are not needed for the core workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources