get_lexicon_entry

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavior. It states that the tool retrieves information, implying a read-only operation, but does not explicitly mention any side effects, permissions, or lack thereof.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words. It is well-structured and immediately conveys the tool's core function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic purpose and some parameter semantics, but lacks usage context (e.g., when to prefer this over siblings) and does not describe the return format. Since an output schema is present, the return format omission is acceptable, but the missing usage guidance leaves the description incomplete for effective tool selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description partially explains the 'query' parameter by indicating it accepts a lemma or Strong's ID. The 'lang' parameter is only presented with an enum and default, leaving its purpose inferable but not explicit. This adds some value beyond the raw schema, which has no descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Retrieve') and the resource ('lexicon definition, semantic range, and distribution statistics'). It is specific and unambiguous, though it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'lookup_word' or 'search_lemma'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the sibling tools. The description does not mention any conditions or contexts that would make this tool the preferred choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.