Create Design Asset Upload

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It mentions creating a signed upload target and record, but doesn't disclose important behaviors: that the upload URL is temporary, that the asset is not finalized until an upload step, or any permission/rate limit implications. For a write operation, this is incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundancy. However, it is too brief for the complexity; essential details are missing, so it's not as helpful as it could be. Still, it's concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 9 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too sparse. It doesn't explain the two-step upload process, what the response contains (signed URL?), or how to complete the upload. The tool is complex but the description doesn't reflect that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-described in schema. Description adds no extra meaning beyond what's in the property descriptions. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action: create a signed upload target and collection asset record for parking a DRL/FVI design asset. This distinguishes it from siblings like park_design_asset and create_design_asset_version, which do different operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With 8 sibling tools, the description should indicate context (e.g., 'use this to initiate an upload; after uploading, use park_design_asset to finalize'). It lacks any usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.