Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FreeApply

  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables an LLM client to read a structured CV resource and send tailored application emails to recruiters via SMTP.
    1
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables parallel job discovery and form-filling across ATS platforms such as Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, SmartRecruiters and Workday, defaulting to dry runs and stopping at approval gates before any irreversible step. It supports policy-based filtering, deduplication, and local-first LLM routing so routine fields and generated prose stay on the user's machine, escalating only when necessary.
    MIT

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables Claude to parse CVs, search job boards (Remotive, Arbeitnow, Adzuna, Greenhouse/Lever), tailor resumes and cover letters, and prepare application packages with direct apply links—without ever auto-submitting. It runs 100% locally and free, storing jobs and applications as JSON files.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Turns Claude into a local job-search assistant that pulls openings from public job-board and company APIs, scores each one 0–100 against your profile with explainable reasons, and generates ATS-friendly CVs and cover letters tailored to each offer without inventing any figures. It also tracks every application and follow-up in a local SQLite database and helps prepare interviews, while leaving the actual applying to you.
    1
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables automated job searching from multiple boards, filtering matches against saved criteria, deduplicating seen postings, and tracking application statuses. Runs locally and integrates with Claude Desktop for natural-language queries and updates.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to discover postings from watched company boards ranked by keyword fit, tailor and fact-check resumes against a source-cited profile, render ATS-readable PDFs, submit applications through the user's own browser, and track replies and follow-ups. All ranking, claim checking and email classification run as plain code, so LLM tokens are spent only on writing.
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables users to search for jobs, prefill applications using AI, and automate submissions across major platforms like Lever and Ashby directly from Claude or Cursor. It provides a full suite of tools for managing job queues, profile data, and resumes within a chat interface.
    37
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Lets an AI agent search nine job boards across eight countries, filter roughly 4,700 salary-transparent tech postings by pay, remote work, technology, and level, and apply to them without leaving the terminal. It also tracks past applications locally so already-applied jobs are hidden from later searches.
    -

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 18 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Every tool carries an explicit 'Unlike X, which does Y' clause that draws sharp boundaries between superficially similar tools (update_job vs record_outcome vs claim_job; report_site_problem vs find_site_account; get_settings vs user_answers vs status). The read-only reporting tools (status, get_settings, job_stats, list_jobs) are clearly separated by what each returns, so an agent can pick correctly without guessing.

Naming Consistency4/5

All 18 tools share the freeapply_ prefix and most follow a verb_noun pattern (get_settings, fetch_posting, claim_job, report_site_problem, clear_to_submit). A handful are noun-only (status, user_answers, job_stats, autorun, shared_data), which is a minor deviation rather than a different convention, and all remain readable and predictable.

Tool Count4/5

18 tools is slightly heavy but each maps to a distinct step in the apply/check-replies lifecycle (setup, settings, postings, claim, text check, submit clearance, status updates, site issues, replies, sharing). Nothing looks redundant, though a few convenience tools could arguably be folded into larger ones.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the full workflow end to end: setup/status, settings read-write, posting fetch, job claim/update/list/stats, truthfulness checking, saved answers, site accounts and problems, submit pacing, unattended runs, reply checks and outcomes, and data sharing. Minor gaps remain — no way to delete or purge a tracked job, and no single-job getter (only paged list_jobs) — but these are workaroundable.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues