Skip to main content
Glama
Foxhunt

GitLab MCP Server

by Foxhunt
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to GitLab MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • gitlab-mcp

      EllGree
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with GitLab API, supporting both self-hosted instances and gitlab.com. Provides tools for managing issues, merge requests, code review, pipelines, milestones, releases, search, and file access.
      414 npm
      MIT

    • GitLab MCP Server

      LoindP
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with GitLab via the GitLab REST API v4, providing tools for managing projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, and more through MCP.
      5 npm
      ISC

    • gitlab-mcp-server

      kopiloto
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interacting with GitLab repositories, merge requests, and code through natural language using MCP. Supports authentication with personal access tokens or OAuth2, and provides tools for listing projects, reading repository code, and analyzing merge request lifetimes.
      10
      4
      MIT

    • mcp-gitlab

      vish288
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the GitLab REST API providing tools to manage projects, merge requests, pipelines, CI/CD variables, approvals, issues, and code reviews.
      933 PyPI
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource-action pair. Even similar-looking list/get pairs are clarified by singular/plural naming and descriptions. The search tool is intentionally broader but not confusable with the specific list tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools use the gitlab_ prefix and snake_case, but collection endpoints are inconsistent: list_ is used for projects, wiki pages, and milestones, while get_ is used for issues, todos, and issue notes. This mixed convention is readable but not uniform.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 16 tools the set is slightly above the typical well-scoped range, but each tool addresses a distinct operation. The cluster of issue-related tools is granular but reasonable for a GitLab-focused server.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers issue creation/editing and MR creation/editing, but lacks list/get merge requests, which creates a dead end for locating MRs to edit. There are also no delete operations, and project management is limited to listing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources