Retrieve recent codebase memories, such as snippets or traces, from active projects on Kratos-MCP. Filter by path prefix or include expired entries to maintain context for AI coding tools.
Get recent memories from active project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| include_expired | No | Include expired memories | |
| k | No | Max results | |
| path_prefix | No | Filter by path prefix |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose behavioral traits like read-only nature, authentication needs, rate limits, or side effects beyond the implied 'get' operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence, front-loads key information with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal description for a tool with 3 optional parameters and no output schema. Lacks clarity on how 'recent' is defined or what 'active project' means. Adequate but could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 100% parameter description coverage. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema; baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get recent memories from active project', specifying the verb (get), resource (memories), and scope (recent, active project). It distinguishes from siblings like memory_get (generic) and memory_search (search-specific).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., memory_get, memory_search). No context on prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.