MCP Server Modal
mcp-서버-모달
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DcrSKbcsXrzCoyMe0XtAsDcE3IgBV1bLirUG80VxPq8/edit?tab=t.0
사용자가 Python 스크립트를 모달 에 배포할 수 있는 MCP 서버입니다.
설치
모달이 설정되어 있는지 확인하세요.
지엑스피1
그런 다음 Claude 데스크톱 앱에서 파일 시스템 서버로 서버를 설정하세요.
{
"mcpServers": {
"mcp-server-modal": {
"command": "uv",
"args": [
"--directory",
"/path/to/mcp-server-modal",
"run",
"modal-server"
]
},
"filesystem": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem",
"/Users/user/Desktop/",
"/path/to/other/dir"
]
}
}
}Related MCP server: Remote MCP Server
용법
클로드에서 파이썬 스크립트를 제공하고 모달 애플리케이션을 생성하여 배포하도록 요청하세요. 코드 생성 후, 모달 애플리케이션 링크를 받게 되며, 이 링크를 사용해 보고 다른 사람들과 공유할 수 있습니다.
개발
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector uv --directory /path/to/mcp-server-modal run modal-serverAvailable Tools
1 tooldeployD
some description
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| modal_path | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. 'some description' reveals nothing about whether this is a read/write operation, what permissions are needed, side effects, rate limits, or response format. It's completely inadequate for a tool with a potentially significant action like 'deploy'.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While technically concise with just two words, this is a case of harmful under-specification rather than effective brevity. The description fails to communicate any meaningful information, so its conciseness doesn't serve the purpose of helping an AI agent understand the tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool named 'deploy' with one required parameter, no annotations, no output schema, and 0% schema coverage, the description 'some description' is completely inadequate. It provides no information about what gets deployed, to where, with what consequences, or what the parameter means. This leaves the agent with essentially no usable information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the single parameter 'modal_path' is completely undocumented in the schema. The description 'some description' adds zero information about what this parameter means, what format it expects, or how it influences the deployment. This leaves the parameter entirely unexplained.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'some description' is a tautology that merely restates the tool name 'deploy' without specifying what it actually does. It provides no verb, resource, or scope information, making it completely uninformative about the tool's purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool, what context it applies to, or any prerequisites. With no sibling tools mentioned, there's no need for differentiation, but the description fails to provide even basic usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools, as there are no other tools to confuse it with. The tool's purpose is inherently distinct by default in this minimal set.
A single tool inherently exhibits perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tool names to compare it against or deviate from. The name 'deploy' follows a clear verb pattern, but consistency is trivially achieved with only one element.
A single tool is generally too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and suggests an incomplete or overly narrow scope. For a server named 'MCP Server Modal', which implies modal interactions or deployments, one tool feels insufficient to cover meaningful workflows or operations.
With only a 'deploy' tool, the surface is severely incomplete for any reasonable domain inferred from the server name. There are obvious gaps, such as lacking tools for managing, updating, listing, or deleting deployments, making it impossible for agents to perform basic lifecycle operations without workarounds.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Hosted MCP server connecting claude.ai, ChatGPT and other AI apps to your own computer
Create, deploy, and operate MCP servers directly from your GitHub repositories.
Deploy full-stack apps (Postgres, Redis, S3, workers, backups) from Claude or curl. 59 MCP tools.
MCP server for building and testing AI agents with multi-model experimentation and insights.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to interact with Modal, allowing them to deploy apps and run functions in a serverless cloud environment.73MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA deployable MCP server on Cloudflare Workers that can be accessed from Claude Desktop or Cloudflare AI Playground, allowing users to create and use custom AI tools without authentication.
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing Modal — apps, containers, volumes, and secrets — and for deploying & running Modal apps directly from Claude Code and other MCP clients.123MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables Claude to deploy full-stack web apps to Cloudflare, including databases, authentication, and file storage, directly through natural language.
Appeared in Searches
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Flux159/mcp-server-modal'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server