search_templates
Search WhatsApp message templates using a text query. Locate templates that match specific terms.
Instructions
Search templates by text
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Search query |
Search WhatsApp message templates using a text query. Locate templates that match specific terms.
Search templates by text
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Search query |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose behavioral traits such as partial match behavior, case sensitivity, pagination, or response format. For a search tool, these are critical gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, efficient and front-loaded. No wasted words, but could be expanded without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite simple schema, the description lacks context on what fields are searched (name, content?), how results are presented, and any limitations. With no output schema, more details are needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'query' described as 'Search query'. Tool description adds no further meaning beyond that, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states verb 'search', resource 'templates', and method 'by text'. It distinguishes from siblings like list_templates (list all) and get_template (by ID), though could be more specific.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use search_templates versus list_templates or get_template. Does not mention that search is text-based and filtering differs from listing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Floryvibla/mcp-evolution-api'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server