reboot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It usefully enumerates the four boot modes, including that 'recovery', 'bootloader', and 'sideload' put the device into special states, which is real behavioral information. However, it omits that this is a disruptive, state-changing operation that drops the ADB connection and interrupts running apps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, action first, parameter enumeration second. No filler; every clause carries information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, and the mode semantics are covered. Still missing for a 2-param device-control tool are the meaning of `serial` (device targeting) and any note about connectivity loss during reboot.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It fully explains the `mode` parameter's accepted values and default, which is genuinely additive, but says nothing about `serial`, leaving half the parameters undocumented in both schema and description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Reboot the device'), which is unambiguous and distinct from every sibling (no other tool in the list reboots). It stops short of a 5 only because it adds no scope or differentiation context beyond the bare action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor on prerequisites (device must be connected/selected) or consequences of rebooting. Usage is only implied by the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.