No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools target distinct resources or lifecycle stages: investigation setup, checklist, citations, claims, sections, diagrams, validation, publishing, inventories, comparison, schema, and REA CLI operations. The main ambiguity is between aa_finish and aa_render, since both publish reports, though their descriptions distinguish workspace-backed vs workspace-free publishing. aa_status and aa_rea_status are also close in naming but clearly separate investigation status from REA CLI probing.
All tools share the aa_ prefix and use readable snake_case, with a predictable verb_noun pattern for most operations such as aa_upsert_claim and aa_set_run_meta. Minor deviations appear in noun-only names like aa_status, aa_checklist, aa_inventory, and aa_schema, but the overall convention remains consistent.
Sixteen tools are slightly over the typical comfortable range, but the server covers several related workflows: investigation setup, report authoring, validation/publishing, inventory comparison, schema introspection, and REA CLI integration. Each tool appears to have a concrete role rather than being redundant padding.
The surface covers the main lifecycle from investigation setup through checklist tracking, evidence citation, report authoring, validation, and publishing, plus inventory/comparison and REA CLI helpers. Minor gaps exist around explicit deletion or listing of existing investigations/reports and removing individual report elements, but core workflows are well supported.